Category: Internet Commentary Issues

Citizen Journalist Social Commentary: Video of the Month, March 2011

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

Tags: social commentary, political satire, American politics, fascism in the democratic party, signs of political fascism, the Obama nation, the Obama media presidency, mass media social engineering American society, mind control via mass media, how the media elected barack obama

America’s Shameful Kali Yuga Omen: Northwestern University Allows Live Sex Demonstration in Classroom

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

ATTRIBUTES OF THE FOURTH KALI YUGA PERIOD

A discourse by Markandeya in the Mahabharataidentifies some of the attributes of Kali Yuga:

IN RELATION TO RULERS

  • Rulers will become unreasonable: they will levy taxes unfairly.
  • Rulers will no longer see it as their duty to promote spirituality, or to protect their subjects: they will become a danger to the world.
  • People will start migrating, seeking countries where wheat and barley form the staple food source.

IN HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS

  • Avarice and wrath will be common. Humans will openly display animosity towards each other.
  • Ignorance of dharma will occur.
  • People will have thoughts of murder with no justification and will see nothing wrong in that.
  • Lust will be viewed as socially acceptable and sexual intercourse will be seen as the central requirement of life.
  • Sin will increase exponentially, whilst virtue will fade and cease to flourish.
  • People will take vows and break them soon after.
  • People will become addicted to intoxicating drinks and drugs.
  • Men will find their jobs stressful and will go to retreats to escape their work.
  • Gurus will no longer be respected and their students will attempt to injure them. Their teachings will be insulted, and followers of Kama will wrest control of the mind from all human beings. Brahmins will not be learned or honoured, Kshatriyas will not be brave,Vaishyas will not be just in their dealings and Shudras will not be honest and humble in their duties and to the other castes.

As the end times Kali Yuga cycle rages on, I have observed, as decades pass, that what constitutes an “acceptable” amount of sexual content on television has gradually escalated with each new TV season. The “insidious gradualism” I have often referred to which is inherent in social re-engineering of entire populations, has been at work in the escalation of erotic imagery in TV for 40 years now. Where we didn’t expect to see it escalating was on college campuses.

In the 1950s, 1960s or even in the 1970s, for the most part, an aroused couple would never consider disrobing and making love on the public grounds of the town square, where cars passed and people strolled not more than 20 yards away. Neither would they have ever considered it normal under any circumstances to disrobe and perform an intimate sex act in front of college students, mostly younger than 25 years,  in a classroom setting, on the campus of a respected American university. During that cherished period in American life, the moral standards agreed upon for television usually held true for day to day life as well.

During that era most people had an intrinsic sense of decency, common sense, an innate feel for universal social mores and protocols, a civilizing ingredient to modern life which is now missing in action in the United States. We used to use the word “decorum” to describe this built-in barometer of what is appropriate and what is not. Southern women seem to be genetically endowed with an abundance of it. You will most certainly know, beyond all doubt, when you have done or said something that offends the innate sensibilities of a southern bred woman. At least that’s the way it used to be, a long time ago, just yesterday.

Likewise, the common civility and moral decency which used to be part and parcel to the backbone of the nation itself has now eroded beyond recognition.

Growing up as a kid, eight, maybe ten years old, a “screen kiss” was considered the conventional public ceiling for the portrayal of sexual intimacy between couples in the 1950s and early 60s on TV shows. “Primetime” TV hours were considered to be between 7 pm and 9:30 pm, and honored school kids and their families by “keeping it clean” until about 11:30 pm, when the kids had gone to bed. Then mom and dad, if they had the energy, might stay up late and take in part of the Johnny Carson Show. All the really adult, really sexy stuff that you could ever locate on TV would take place on the Johnny Carson Show. Up and coming Hollywood starlets were paraded before the audience for inspection, new comics tried out their jokes on middle America { Carson was from the midwest, and was beloved by middle America and the heartland} and tawdry conversations usually spilled out about twenty minutes before the closing credits. By then everyone was tired, punchy, and Carson would risk some of his more controversial material, trying it on to see what brought down the house.

Carson’s show would get a little racy from time to time, especially when guests like Dean MartinFrank Sinatra or some other pop celebrity showed up telling a few off color jokes that passed the network’s guidelines for appropriate entertainment content. When this happened the network phones would light up and advertising sponsors would promptly pull their products if someone went too far, said or did something that was pretty much universally agreed to be “over the top.”

It was an era in television and film when one’s public reputation took a marked slide in the wrong direction if inappropriate public behavior was displayed either on TV, in an interview, on screen, or in front of a camera, even casually. No one ever had to debate what sort of behaviors and comments were “over the

top” back then. Certain things were just understood, and it did not take a rocket scientist to explain what was inappropriate behavior or commentary on live broadcast TV. If a man said the word “penis” on live television in 1959, or 1963, yeah, that was over the top. Other words were on that “live TV broadcast no-no” list too. George Carlin dropped jaws and broke new ground in the early 1970s, shattering existing notions about what “over the top” was when he included every one of the “seven forbidden TV words” in his new live stand up comic act, performed in theatres, not on TV, making his comedy both notorious and lucrative beyond measure. George Carlin cursed like a sailor in front of his audiences and his fame grew from the resulting civic and social fallout.

Apparently it both appalled and fascinated Americans in the early 1970s to watch a grown man stand up on stage before a paying audience and recite the seven most forbidden words in the entertainment business, and not be hauled off to jail. Of course for us young hippies, we weren’t nearly as astounded by all this as our parents were. We’d experienced Mick Jagger, Woodstock, David Bowie and Jim Morrison by now, and we were “thus made worldly” by such rock star encounters in interesting new ways that our parents could not fathom.

Had anyone peeked into my distant future as a fifteen year old kid in the early1970s, and informed me that one day, far and away, well past the year 2000, that I would grow up to write social commentary about a respected American university allowing the performance of a live sex show, complete with fetish sex toys and a man bringing his nude partner to orgasm in front of a room full of college students, I would have considered them to be stark raving, of course. Had I known about such a future as that when I was fifteen years old it would have frightened me, for starters, grossed me out beyond that, and made me wonder if I really wanted to grow up and inhabit a future where things like that were allowed to happen.

But the day has come. I have arrived in my slow moving time machine, called the physical body, and landed in 2011, at the precise point in time and space where just such an event has taken place. The bar for what we now refer to as “civilized and appropriate public behavior” has been lowered so far, they now dig trenches to put it in. I’m not proud of writing this post, and I am not proud of citing this article below. I’m not proud of my country, and I am so far beyond appalled that the staff and faculty at Northwestern allowed this to happen, that I just about can’t think of anything to say to them, except maybe to advise someone retire from public life immediately and find a new Dean for the school who has at least one half of a brain.

I wonder: have the days long passed when Americans could be offended enough to light up phone lines,  burn up mail boxes, and organize an all out boycott of Northwestern University, the venerable institution of higher education [ ahem! ]  that allowed this spectacle below to take place? This school is supposed to be a place where parents pay good money, often working two jobs,  to send their kids to get educated so they can move out and earn their own way in life. Can you just imagine Johnny texting his dad on the golf course to tell him what he learned in his freshman class today?

Will the absolute lack of outage over this event tell us all just how low the bar has now settled? It does beg the question: how low will the bar finally drop for what is considered acceptable public behavior in the United States?

Will the next ten years see open coupling of lovebirds in McDonald’s fast food booths, in plain sight, citing their civil right to do so because a live sex show was allowed on a public college campus in 2011, no charges were brought,  no public outrage ensued, therefore they too have a right to display their affection in any way they choose, at any time, in any place, naked and using sex toys too if they feel so inclined? How immoral and uncivilized will Americans become, now that the “moral behavioral bar” has crashed four stories below the basement floor of Northwestern University?

Will the next case that comes up before the Supreme Court have to do with a couple’s right to experience open lovemaking and full nudity on public town squares, cars whizzing by, people gawking as they stand in line for the bus, high noon, broad daylight, with no fear of breaking any laws, legal or moral, and no risk of prosecution?

How low will the social and behavioral bar go for what is considered acceptable public conduct in America?

Chase Kyla Hunter

Article cited below:

LIVE SEX DEMONSTRATION TROUBLES, DISAPPOINTS NORTHWESTERN PRESIDENT

BY KARA SPAK Staff Reporter/kspak@suntimes.com Mar 3, 2011 11:55PM

Story ImageNU President Morton Schapiro

Northwestern University phone lines lit up Thursday with calls from alumni and parents of students unhappy about a live sex demonstration in an optional after-class lecture.

Morton Schapiro, university president, didn’t disagree with the callers and said he was launching an investigation into the incident. He released a statement describing himself as “troubled and disappointed” about the use of a high-powered sex toy on a naked woman by her fiancé in front of more than 100 students on Feb. 21.

“I feel it represented extremely poor judgment on the part of our faculty member,” Schapiro said. “I simply do not believe this was appropriate, necessary or in keeping with Northwestern University’s academic mission.”

The couple who performed the act, Jim Marcus, 45, and Faith Kroll, 25, were part of a group of four adults brought to speak to the students about the world of kink and fetish in an optional seminar that followed Prof. J. Michael Bailey’s popular “Human Sexuality” class. None of the speakers, including Marcus and Kroll, are Northwestern students.

Schapiro’s statement Thursday reversed a statement the university issued Wednesday where they defended their faculty as “at the leading edge of their respective disciplines.”

“The university supports the efforts of its faculty to further the advancement of knowledge,” Wednesday’s statement said.

On campus Thursday, students said the incident was old news and noted it happened in an optional after-class lecture where they were repeatedly warned about the graphic nature of the demonstration.

Facebook pages lit up in the days after the on-stage sex toy penetration, with updates like “you won’t believe what I saw in class today,” said Graham Horn, an 18-year-old freshman history major who was not in Bailey’s class. Now, students are tired of the story, he said.

“I think it’s awful the amount of attention this is getting,” he said. “I think it’s amazing that our university provided us with the opportunity to experience this. I was disappointed by Schapiro’s denouncement of the professor.”

Kroll and Marcus said they engaged in the act to help students learn that certain controversial aspects of female orgasm were real, a point they believe a video the students watched in class was not making adequately.

The live sex act featured a sex toy that was a modified version of a power tool known as a reciprocating saw, or Sawzall. The tool used at Northwestern featured a phallic attachment in place of the blade.

“It’s a BDSM (bondage, discipline, sadism, masochism) toy but it’s not like a pain thing,” said Ken Melvoin-Berg, who teaches “Networking for Kinky People,” runs a Chicago sex bus tour and was being paid by Northwestern for the Feb. 21 after-class lecture, which he narrated.

Of the nearly 600 students registered for “Human Sexuality,” only about 100 stayed for the after-class lecture. After being warned, some chose to leave before Kroll stripped down on a stage in the Ryan Family Auditorium. Bailey described student feedback as “uniformly positive.”

Schapiro said school officials want to know exactly what happened, and why. “I have directed that we investigate fully the specifics of this incident, and also clarify what constitutes appropriate pedagogy, both in this instance and in the future,” he wrote.

Bailey said Wednesday it was too early to say if he regretted allowing the couple to perform for the students. He did not respond to requests seeking additional comment Thursday.

While watching a naked female be brought to orgasm by a sex toy may not have bothered many students, Schapiro was troubled.

“Many members of the Northwestern community are disturbed by what took place on our campus,” his statement said. “So am I.”

Related Articles


You Say You Want A Revolution? The Beatles, Live Performance

Copyright 2011-3011 By CK Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

“Revolution” by the Beatles, Lyrics:

Send “Revolution” Ringtone to your Cell

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it’s evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don’t you know that you can count me out
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right

You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We’re doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
Ah

ah, ah, ah, ah, ah…

You say you’ll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
all right, all right, all right

Donald Rumsfeld’s Problematic Memoir: WMD “Lost and Found” Question Still at Large

rumsfeld [unknown unknowns]

Donald Rumsfeld

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

Author’s note: As much as Julian Assange may be reviled by those in high political places, his exposed Wikileaks diplomatic cables reveal something that causes more rewriting [again] of what we thought we knew to be true about the Iraq war. Numerous links are posted on these pages:

http://exposingliberallies.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-is-confirming-iraqs-wmd.html

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/

These two posts purport that [ after everything, including ruined careers aplenty ] there was, in fact, WMD located in Iraq before the war, and that Russia removed part of it and the US removed other parts.  The operative dilemma is what constitutes the actual definition of “WMD.” I am taking the position in the essay below that nuclear weapons of mass destruction is the defined term. Only the hidden files of the American Military Industrial complex contain the actual truth on the matter. Whatever was located by Russian and US forces, confiscated, squirreled away for future uses, we may never know.

So I am posting this note to let readers know there is still controversy over what was found, who found it, where it is, and how it may be used in the future.

I had written the essay below before I located the information above. I have now been exposed to so much contradictory information about “Iraqi WMD” that I don’t really know what to believe. But such is the reality of trying to report as a citizen journalist in the current American milleau of media spin, left wing disinformation, right wing counter-disinformation and all the rest.

It is truly maddening. I wanted to post the link to the information above, but I cannot verify it. Most of it comes from one blog, so buyer beware. Here’s an excerpt:

‘The release by Julian Assange’s web site Wikileaks of classified documents reveals that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, Washington, DC officials and the news media have ignored this information.

One of the WikiLeaks document dumps reveals that as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.

There are numerous mentions of chemical and biological weapons in the WikiLeaks documents, however the U.S. media appear only interested in those portions of the leaked material that highlight actions that are viewed as embarrassing for the U.S. military such as the accusation that U.S. commanders were aware of abuse and “torture” of prisoners by Iraqi soldiers and police officers.

The U.S. Defense Department continues to demand that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange immediately return the stolen military documents in his possession, including recent documents that created another stir when published, according to Elaine Wilson of American Forces Press Service.

The department also wants the whistle-blowing web site to permanently delete all versions of these documents, which contain classified and sensitive information, from its web site, computers and records, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters during a Pentagon briefing.

WikiLeaks documents don’t reveal evidence of a massive weapons program by Saddam Hussein — the Bush administration’s leading rationale for invading Iraq — or some enormous stockpile of WMD, but do reveal that chemical weapons did vanish from the Iraqi battlefield.

According to the latest WikiLeaks document “dump,” Saddam’s toxic arsenal, significantly reduced after the Gulf War, remained intact. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict and may have brewed up their own deadly agents, according to the WikiLeaks web site.

During that time, former Iraqi General Georges Sada, Saddam’s top commander, detailed the transfers of Iraq’s WMD. “There [were] weapons of mass destruction gone out from Iraq to Syria, and they must be found and returned to safe hands,” Mr. Sada said. “I am confident they were taken over.”

Gen. Sada’s comments came just a month after Israel’s top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, claimed that Saddam Hussein “transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria.”

In 2004, for example, American special forces members secretly purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard which have been used since World War I. Following testing in a military lab, the chemical was then secured and transferred to a secret location.’

[end excerpt]

Chase Kyla Hunter 02.04.2011

Below is my original essay from yesterday:


I always knew that the only man more arrogant than Dick Cheney in the George W. Bush White House was Donald Rumsfeld.I had grown tired of watching geriatric old white men try to run the country at least 20 years earlier when George’s father was in the White House, running up the national debt to near crisis levels back then. It took Ross Perot to remind us all about that, with his charts and graphs and funny ears.Then came the high IQ southern rooster, Bill Clinton, another Bilderberg man all the way, brainy, but a poor excuse for a national leader on moral, marital and ethical terms.Clinton played the saxophone on late night TV to get the youth vote. He was a flagrant womanizer, and no amount of public relations media sheen would be able to eventually obfuscate that fact. His wife seemed to be a lot smarter than he was, but she had chronic “bad hair” and Americans took deep umbrage at her crack about “not staying home and making cookies” during Bill’s presidency. Hillary too, seemed doomed by her behaviors and commentary to become a tolerated political thorn in the nation’s side.

By the time we got to George Junior, via his crooked relatives in Florida and his old boy’s club cronies who sat on the Supreme Court, I was already so disgusted with the sad sorry affair of what we are offered as an excuse for presidential leadership in this country, that I was mostly tuning it all out. I was historically apolitical, found it all distasteful and routinely dishonest and for the most part could have cared less. I watched sadly as Al Gore went home and accepted the fact that his election night win and his presidency had been stolen from him.

The popular vote was turning out to be irrelevant after all, just like intelligent political observers had noted many years earlier.

I continued to assume that the national electoral college was honest and ethical for the most part, because I hated considering the alternative.

But it was a hard pill to swallow, seeing it all play out on national TV right before our eyes. Looking back I know now it had nothing to do with “hanging chads in Florida.” America was still in denial back then I suppose. We really did not want to believe that it was who you knew, who you paid off, who your daddy knew, and most importantly, what the Bilderbergers wanted, that dictated who would run the country.

In 2000 many of us still thought our voices mattered and our presidential votes counted. We were naive and we just didn’t know better.

Right after George Junior took office he began to plan the Iraq war. As Michael Moore noted in “Fahrenheit 9-11” the younger Bush enjoyed golf, and he played frequently. He was playing lots and lots of golf in the weeks and months right before 9-11 took place. He took fishing trips. He played cowboy on his Texas ranch.

Then came 9-11 and the shock and grief of a nation stunned by an act of evil so monstrous we could barely comprehend it. Every American alive right now who was an adult when 9-11 occurred will always recall where they were and what they were doing when the event took place. It was an obelisk driven into the ground of our collective memory, a moment in time which marked the end of our political innocence and the beginning of our descent into the incomprehensible.

A lone lady FBI agent working in a field office in the northern Midwest had seen this coming. She had warned her superiors about the probability and likelihood of a terrorist attack involving jihadists who would use American jetliners to fly into buildings. Her repeated field reports were disregarded. She was ignored. The attack took place. The Bilderberg plan proceeded.

Not knowing the horrendous back end of the event at the time, after 9-11 a furious and desperate patriotism in America foamed at a fever pitch I had never witnessed before.

Everywhere people who were usually politically aloof now flew American flags: on their car radio antennas, on their front porches, on t-shirts and jewelry, on houseboats, at rodeos, in shabby trailer parks and even in graffiti washed inner city ghettos. We had been told that Osama Bin Laden was the culprit, the mastermind of this attack, and we all wanted his head on a platter.

Tell me, have you heard anyone in the press even mention Bin Laden’s name in the past few years? More oddly: have you ever heard Barack Obama mention the name “Osama Bin Laden?”

The CIA knows all about the hidden truth on the Bin Laden story. They are holding the master dossier. And unless we burn them out with ever more scalding truth reports that “out” more of their horrendous secrets from the deep rabbit-hole of hidden black ops, they will never reveal what they know.

By late 2001, post 9-11, western style wanted posters of Bin Laden were appearing on hundreds of websites. Open plans for the war on Iraq were discussed and debated on Big Media news outlets.

We were being told again and again about Saddam Hussein and his colossal stash of “weapons of mass destruction.” We all became familiar with the term “WMD.”

One of our favorite American sons at the time, Colin Powell, who was a trusted political figure before the Iraq war, went before the UN and made his case for war. In spite of the dissent and debate which roared over it, the decision had been made in secret, years prior, without our knowledge, without our consent, as usual. The decision had most likely been made before George junior was artificially appointed President, in hidden halls of power that Alex Jones has now made very familiar to everyone with his ranting mega horn blaring, screaming patriotic platitudes at the passing black limousines that swoosh by as they enter some secret destination somewhere for the annual Halloween Witches and Warlocks political carnival that is commonly referred to as the “Annual Secret Bilderberg Meeting.”

We were going to war in Iraq, all costs and consequences be damned.

I distinctly recall those heady moments for Donald Rumsfeld during the early opening moments of theIraq war, during the “shock and awe” phase, when he would strut into the daily national White House press conference and hold court before bewildered and submissive reporters who were trying to understand what was really taking place.

Rumsfeld glowed. He conducted himself like the happiest man in the universe. By God he was at last having his war his way, the war which had been planned for so long, the war which was on the Bilderberg blueprint for America far in advance of 9-11. And now by God he was in charge of it all, having a grand time appearing daily before American TV cameras as the public relations centerpiece of the whole operation. Rumsfeld would strut into those press conferences during the first 90 days of “shock and awe” like the President himself. He could not have been more proud of what was taking place.

It was all enough to make one lose the contents of their stomach, just observing what could only be described as Rumsfeld’s “military glee” with the deluge of death that we were raining down on Baghdad. The media bought the whole thing lock stock and barrel. That was the directive which had been given: “support the war effort, and constrain any dissent.”

Rumsfeld would be questioned with hushed tones of reverence and respect back then, young reporters perspiring to choose their words just right so as not to offend the great military warrior king who was in charge of ridding the world of Iraq’s dreaded “weapons of mass destruction.” For a fleeting moment in American history, Donald Rumsfeld was the most important man in America. Invigorated by all the press and attention, his step had a little extra spring in it when he walked toward the podium to address the press about the progress of our military machine as it pummeled Baghdad.

What a different story history will finally write. Americans are not nearly as uninformed as they were ten years ago about who and what really runs the country and what they have done.

The scripted Rumsfeld daily press conference which played out for about two years described above began to dissipate into national agony and outrage, as we all finally learned the terrible truth. There was no WMD stash hidden in Iraq that our soldiers could locate anywhere. Once again, the inconceivable was being delivered to us via those hated Big Media news heads that strained credulity to the breaking point. It became the most world famous “WTF moment” in modern times.


We had gone to war over a CIA intelligence “mythology,” a fabrication which had been passed along via double-speaking double agents in the Mideast, like an old oral tradition, the original story changing and getting worse with each retelling, until the final version we heard on American Big Media newscasts bore no resemblance whatsoever to the original lie. It was now twenty times worse instead.

Do you suppose Donald Rumsfeld secretly knew the truth all along? Do you suppose that the ruined credibility and dashed career of Colin Powell could have been averted? Or was Powell in on the “WMD terrible truth”  too?

Knowing what I now know about just how dark and sinister our American industrial military complex really is, I don’t know who or what to believe and I trust no history book any longer. I trust no written accounts of any person who worked in any political or media outlet administration, as almost every book written in this nation has some hidden ax to grind, some motive to advance, or some specific agenda to sell to the people.

So, sad and pathetic as it is, and now nearly seven years late, the aging and greatly discredited Donald Rumsfeld is apparently attempting to clear his conscience and buy back a small morsel of his perceived place in history and his need for Americans’ respect by admitting in his new autobiography what we all well know, and have known for years: the three dreadful words that any American male in political public life almost never utters out of the sheer enormity of his ego: “I was wrong.”

Rumsfeld is finally admitting that he was wrong about Iraq having WMD. Why should we care at this point? It seems so irrelevant now. I think about the thousands of good American men and women who have been killed, maimed, and the tens of thousands of children in America who will grow up without their mothers and fathers who died in the Iraq war. These families deserve better than Rumsfeld’s lame ass seven years late admission. His book only makes me more furious about the mountain of lies we have all been told.

Once upon a time in the old American west the lynch mob took care of rotten-to-the-core men like Donald Rumsfeld who lusted for power and tried to rule young western American outposts crookedly by the “might is right” plan. But now, one hundred and fifty years later, we let our national disgraces retire to their ranches, their golf courses, their lobster, their banquet halls.  We are politically correct to our eventual ruin.

Had Rumsfeld admitted what he REALLY knew seven years ago, would it have made any difference? How long must the American people be forced to put up with such screaming hubris, sheer wickedness, corruption and incompetence in our political leaders?

How many more people have to die in these NWO pre-planned and pre-packaged wars, designed by and for the gain of the Bilderberg ruling elites at the top of the Illuminati pyramid before we finally get some intelligent independent leadership in the White House, that’s not owned by the UN / CFR mandate?

Beginning just a few months back, at the end of 2010, the opinion and commentary of the CFR is now openly broadcast on NBC Evening News, on radio newscasts and in the press, with little public outcry. The brainwashing of the unawakened American sheeple is just about complete. As events line up for World War III they will march more tens of thousands of US soldiers to their graves for the profit of the Illuminati clan at the top of the Freemason pyramid, unless the American people say “No more. We will not fight your Illuminati ‘designer wars’ any longer.”

When will the White House be returned to the American people and wrested from the Bilderberg usurpers who have ruined our country, escalated our national debt into the stratosphere, and lied to generations of Americans like me until I now have come to the culminating moment when I trust no man, no book, no news report, no talking head, and no current world event?

I now know EXACTLY how the character “Truman” in the film “The Truman Show” felt as he sailed his little boat to the edge of his fake make-believe world, and crashed it into the “edge of the sky” where the dome’s floor met the sea line. I know exactly how he felt as he groped his way along the seam, looking for an exit, trying to find the door.

I want OUT of this psychotic “orchestrated American reality show” that we have all been forced to live in for 50 years or more, with most world events that we thought were the result of natural processes instead having been the product of hidden Bilderberg, CFR, CIA, NSA, and other machinating elitist orgs behind the scenes, pulling strings while pushing their cover stories down our throats. Modern television “programming” was basically invented to placate, distract and inebriate the national psyche while international actuality was pre-planned for us months and years in advance from behind the scenes. Where does it end?

When will we have a President that is not a CIA bred Manchurian, who does not exist simply to carry out the Bilderberg, CFR and UN mandate, existing more or less as a “public relations hood ornament” to the globalist agenda of the ruling elites?

At this point most Americans would be happy with any man or woman of any race or combination of races who has the sheer courage to stand up and face the ruling elites, decline their directives, run the country without them, and manage the cunning to stay alive and not be assassinated in so doing. John F. Kennedy was trying to “go public” about numerous hidden directives from the elites which he refused to comply with when he was assassinated. It’s not hard to do the math on that.

It’s time to pour some cleansing Red Devil Lye down that CIA black ops rabbit-hole. It’s time to put an end to the Bilderberg group. God will show us how He wants this done. I maintain that there is a Divine Intervention afoot in this nation, and I believe devoutly that the Holy Spirit will lead the American people and show them how to proceed. How NOT to proceed is what we are all watching play out in Egypt. That is the typical testosterone solution and it will never be the answer.

It’s past time to put a woman in the White House. It’s twenty years past time. Nothing is more feared on the planet than the righteous fury of a spiritually empowered woman who walks with the Holy Spirit and knows what she has to do. Nothing is more formidable than a woman in political power who walks with God, and inwardly knows it. If she walks with God, she won’t have to tell the nation. The nation will know. The Holy Spirit will make sure of it.

Is she out there? Is she ready? Is she fully prepared for the hatred and rage will rise up against a woman President in this misogynist male dominated nation of bumbling fumbling aging fools who have now careened our country to the precipice of absolute financial and moral abyss? Is she ready to face all the NYC elitist patriarchal women of power, women who have become “female men,” women like Katie Couric, who will riddle her with queries designed to give her the educational and foreign policy litmus test that Sarah Palin so publicly failed?

The calculated and fomented “hatred of Sarah Palin” that is part of the current directive for Big Media to deploy between now and 2012 has just about guaranteed that would-be supporters and voters will be just as hated as she is by the left. I experience this every time I open my mouth and say anything in support of Sarah Palin.

But the divine equation stands: the more a woman in politics is hated and despised by the ruinous far left, the more likely she is to lead the nation in the spiritual, moral and financial right direction. Rumsfeld needs to take his “talking points” memoir, go home to his ranch, and never return to public life. His day in the Bilderberg sun is over. It’s time to prepare for REAL hope and change. It’s time to put an independent politically free, [ not a bought and paid for Muslim CIA Manchurian fraud ], into the White House, and it’s time to return the White House to her people.

Where the men have failed, I believe the right woman, with the right wisdom, and the right comprehension of the task at hand, and the right determination and courage, can and will do this during her presidency, supported by the majority in this country who want out from under the UN’s thumb. I am waiting for her to step forward. I am waiting to see if she really has what it takes. If you are out there, will you please step forward? It’s time.

Chase Kyla Hunter

This essay was picked up and re-posted by the 2.4.11 release of The Blogs Daily on Twitter.

Related Articles

Can Sarah Still Win If She Runs in 2012? Is This Still A Real Political Horse Race?

Sarah Palin at a campaign rally in Raleigh, NC.

Sarah Palin ponders her prospects for 2012

Updated January 20th 2011, Copyright 11.28.2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

To read more essays I’ve written about Sarah Palin, click here.

Update Jan.20th 2011:

What a difference one month and a lunatic massacre makes.

I have entered the  ongoing melee of American political reporting as a citizen journalist in the way that someone might stroll through the doors of a saloon, just to whet their whistle, maybe to get out of the noonday heat, then look up to realize that they are standing right in the middle of a wild west shoot-out, chairs and bodies flying, gunshots ringing to the ceiling, shattered glass smashing. The bartender is knuckled on hands and knees on the floor behind the counter, praying.

So much for getting a civilized gin and tonic. So much for civilized discourse these days on just about anything. Here I am, standing in the middle of the saloon, innocent, just having walked through the doors to escape the noonday heat, and get a drink. Now I feel I have to either fight for my life, or flee. That’s just about exactly what it feels like trying to blog about anything political in the present atmosphere of America in 2011. Now especially since the Loughner massacre, things are tense, the political discourse routinely untrue and rancid.

Now more than ever good solid citizen journalists with a keen eye for spotting and identifying media bias are needed. Without them, actual reporting and truthful accounting of events as they transpire may soon actually disappear in America. The open warfare between left and right wing media outlets threatens to ruin what’s left of journalism, and threatens to disenfranchise the intelligent reading mainstream such that I might be publishing my own print media newspaper soon out of sheer necessity. One of the top ten signs of emerging fascism is the disappearance of a free press. What else would you call what we are all seeing today in America, but that very thing?

– Chase Kyla Hunter 01.20.2011

About one month ago I wrote an essay [which appears below this update ] which reflected on a December 2010 poll on Sarah Palin’s chances in 2012. The December 28th 2010 WSJ poll showed Sarah Palin beating Barack Obama by a nose in 2012. The Obama White House media, popularly known as “MSNBC” has refuted this poll, claiming instead that Obama led Palin by a whopping 22% in December 2010. Lies, Lies, lies.

Anymore one must read at least a dozen news stories then divide the opinions by 12 to get something that might possibly resemble the truth. I call this “media discernment math.” Then came Loughner in the first week of 2011, right after the dead birds omen. Then came the left wing accusatory media melee which stooped so low as to associate Loughner’s motivations for the shooting with right wing political rhetoric, the kind of talk I have been hearing all my life since the advent of talk radio in the 1980s, the kind of speech that often comes from Fox News, and from Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh, or Michael Savage in today’s TV media: nothing more or less than political talk that we hear every day, and nothing different than the conservative talk radio speeches and opinions voiced daily since the mid 1980s.

Then came the out all public fist fight between the left and the right in America, hair flying, right in the middle of the agony and mourning for what lunatic Jared Loughner had done in Arizona. And finally, then came the bizarre Obama led “Memorial Service” with a completely inappropriate lead-off speech by a rambling Native American, an Arizona local, who talked about himself mostly. His eulogy had the air of being more appropriate as the welcome speech for a summer Pow Wow than any grieving commentary for 6 massacred murder victims. [ Put that egg down. I am Cherokee, I’m a public speaker, and I know a “self involved rant” when I hear one ].

Here are some new polls, articles showing the Sarah Palin Weather Report:

Palin Poll Numbers Get Even Worse [ Huff Post, to be expected ]

Huckabee, Palin Lead Pack for 2012, But Are They Even Running?

Palin Putting Out Feelers for 2012 Presidential Bid

POLL: Majority Says Palin Not Liable for Gifford’s Shooting, But Disliked Her Response

“Post Loughner” Palin Bashing Reaches New High, Unfavorable Rating Follows

Quote Daily Caller: “Palin’s national favorability rating is at an anemic 35 percent, against 58 percent who disapprove of the possible GOP presidential candidate. In a match-up against Barack Obama, she trails the president by 17 points. “That’s the largest deficit we’ve found for her since May of 2009,” notes PPP’s Tom Jensen. “She started last week with an opportunity to make some head way. She ended it perhaps further away from the Presidency than she’s been since the day before John McCain picked her as his running mate.”

RE: Sarah Palins’ popularity: On December 28th of 2010 I wrote:

As the Sarah Palin haters rage on, foaming and ranting their fear and hatred of the woman’s basic fundamental goodness all over the web, the Wall Street Journal produced a Poll, imagining the 2012 presidential election were held today. The current results, which of course can change, and allowing for the usual 3% margin of error, put the proverbial 2012 presidential race between Obama and Palin practically neck and neck, with the Mama Grizzly inching out the Mack Daddy Long Legs by a spine shivering slim margin of about 4.5%. In the current poll tally from about 9,400 voters Palin wins currently by 51.3% to 48.7% over Obama.

That fact should have the Palin haters gnashing their teeth and hurling their ipads and smartphones to the floor in rage. Poor far left techno-babies. That’s just enough of a worrisome win to be utterly undone by the possibility of sheer political human evil, should the vote fraud factor kick in, and we all find that the new Orwellian electronic voting machines get tinkered with again, mail in ballots don’t get counted, and all the other potential crookedness and crime that might possibly take place, in fact does take place in 2012. This upcoming election in 2012 would be the horse race to end all races, politically speaking, if Sarah does choose to run.

I would not put anything past the DNC in 2012 to keep the White House, what with it’s very public political bruised ego on display for all to see right now. It’s enough to make a Palin supporter really wonder which way the wind will begin to blow politically for both Obama and Palin between now and next summer, when the election campaign machines  begin gearing up for  November 2012. Here’s the link: http://online.wsj.com/community/groups/election-day-684/topics/palin-obama-would-win-2012

Related Articles