Category: Narcissistic Personality Disorder NPD

Citizen Journalist Social Commentary: Video of the Month, March 2011

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

Tags: social commentary, political satire, American politics, fascism in the democratic party, signs of political fascism, the Obama nation, the Obama media presidency, mass media social engineering American society, mind control via mass media, how the media elected barack obama

Advertisements

Psychologist’s Study on Youth Narcissism Confirms Clairvoyant Premonitions

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

See also: http://www.bclocalnews.com/opinion/117358538.html

Cited: “In Greek mythology Narcissus was a handsome, proud man who disdained those who loved him. He fell in love with his own beautiful reflection in a pool, and because he couldn’t stop looking at it, he starved to death. Narcissists have a great deal of resistance to change, basically because they cannot see a need for changing perfection. Narcissism is the epitome of insight-free self-centeredness. In the modern world the “Narcissistic Personality Disorder” represents the extreme end of the continuum of narcissism.”

Several years back when I first started this blog, I penned an essay titled “My Spirit Led Journey” wherein I described many visions and premonitions I had while living in Taos New Mexico in the early 1990s. It was a very active period in my life spiritually; lucid clairvoyance was opening more deeply at the same time. During an extraordinary season of heightened spiritual and clairvoyant awareness which took place between 1990 and 1993 in the desert southwest, I was “shown” a series of visions about what the immediate and long-term future would bring in the next 20 to 50 years in America, and the world.

I’ve not felt it was appropriate to write about everything I was shown, but I have written about parts of it in the essay linked above. One of the re-occurring revelations which took place in those visions was Spirit revealing what the young people would be like in the near future. I could not have imagined myself what this was, and when I was shown again and again, I really did not want to accept what I was seeing.

I wrote about the increasingly infantile emotionally regressed psychology of the youth of the near future, where narcissistic petulance would replace any real psychological and emotional adulthood.  Nineteen years have now passed since I was spiritually “shown” these things, and five more years have passed since I wrote about them. The learned psychologists of our times are now catching up. The recent article below notes with certain concern and alarm the increasingly narcissistic nature of today’s young people, and the trend does not seem to have a “reverse gear.”

Within another twenty years, by the time I am well into my mid seventies, the young people who are in their twenties now, will be in their forties and in positions of responsibility in society, assuming we have a society left in the states at all.

I shudder to think what kind of leadership they will bring to this nation.  The question now is “how to reverse this trend”? What, if anything, can be done, short of dreaming of a massive overhaul of mass media outlets, and bringing an end to the Hollywood and Big media cults of celebrity and personality worship which these kids emulate?

By glorifying the bi-polar behavior, misogyny and personal violence of men like Charlie Sheen, rewarding him with repeated media interviews each time he acts out, we are telling America’s young people that the way to get your face on a TV screen is to behave like a mentally ill anti-social idiot, and to make sure you do it with TV cameras rolling.

Once again I see the Kali Yuga mentality and manifestation at work in all this. I cited again the manifestations of the Kali Yuga below. The article by the psychologist follows it.

Chase Kyla Hunter 3.7.2011

 

ATTRIBUTES OF THE FOURTH KALI YUGA PERIOD

A discourse by Markandeya in the Mahabharataidentifies some of the attributes of Kali Yuga:
IN RELATION TO RULERS
Rulers will become unreasonable: they will levy taxes unfairly.
Rulers will no longer see it as their duty to promote spirituality, or to protect their subjects: they will become a danger to the world.
People will start migrating, seeking countries where wheat and barley form the staple food source.
IN HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS
Avarice and wrath will be common. Humans will openly display animosity towards each other.
Ignorance of dharma will occur.
People will have thoughts of murder with no justification and will see nothing wrong in that.
Lust will be viewed as socially acceptable and sexual intercourse will be seen as the central requirement of life.
Sin will increase exponentially, whilst virtue will fade and cease to flourish.
People will take vows and break them soon after.
People will become addicted to intoxicating drinks and drugs.
Men will find their jobs stressful and will go to retreats to escape their work.
Gurus will no longer be respected and their students will attempt to injure them. Their teachings will be insulted, and followers of Kama will wrest control of the mind from all human beings. Brahmins will not be learned or honoured, Kshatriyas will not be brave,Vaishyas will not be just in their dealings and Shudras will not be honest and humble in their duties and to the other castes.

Article below cited; see: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/lifematters/new-generation-infected-by-narcissism-says-psychologist-20110302-1bewf.html

New generation infected by narcissism, says psychologist

By Kate Hagan

March 3, 2011

Parents: how to spot a narcissist teen

Have you raised a narcissist? And what can you do about it?

AN ”EPIDEMIC of narcissism” has swept across the student population in the past 30 years, a US expert will tell a conference on personality disorders in Melbourne today.

Jean Twenge, professor of psychology at San Diego State University, said a study she conducted of 16,000 university students across the US showed 30 per cent were narcissistic in psychological tests, compared with 15 per cent in 1982. ”They are all 18 and 19-year-olds, so this is clearly a generational shift,” she said.

Professor Twenge said the finding built on another study based on interviews with 35,000 people of varying ages, who were asked if they had ever had symptoms of narcissism.

Narcissists had an inflated sense of self, lacked empathy, were vain and materialistic and had an overblown sense of entitlement. Illustration by Harry Afentoglou.
Narcissists had an inflated sense of self, lacked empathy, were vain and materialistic and had an overblown sense of entitlement. Illustration by Harry Afentoglou.

”Usually the oldest people have the highest rates, because they have lived for more years, but this data showed the opposite,” she said. Only 3 per cent of those over 65 had had symptoms, but for people in their 20s it was 10 per cent.

”These were shocking numbers because you can only diagnose this starting at age 18, so there weren’t that many years for people in their 20s to develop this, yet their rate was three times as high as people over 65.”

In a keynote address to the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders Congress, Professor Twenge will say that permissive parenting, celebrity culture and the internet are among the causes of the emerging narcissism epidemic.

She said telling children they were special to build self-esteem could foster narcissism.

Narcissists had an inflated sense of self, lacked empathy, were vain and materialistic and had an overblown sense of entitlement. Some resulting social trends were a greater interest in fame and wealth, more plastic surgery, and an increase in attention-seeking crimes – for example, ”beating someone up and putting it on YouTube”.

Professor Twenge was concerned about a culture ”that seems to not just accept narcissism but finds it laudatory … It worries me, when I talk to college students, that they are not surprised at all that their generation is more narcissistic.

”They say, ‘We have to be this way because the world is more competitive.’ But the problem is that narcissism doesn’t help you compete. It blows up in your face eventually.”

She said narcissistic students tended to have poorer results and were more likely to drop out, probably because they thought they didn’t have to study because they were already smart. ”It’s delusional thinking.”

See also:

Obama The Beautiful Frankenstein King

Observing the State of Obama’s Mental Health: What’s Wrong?

Is Barack Obama A Manchurian President?

Blogs, Essays, Posts About Narcissism

WANTED: A New Presidency for America

President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Sing...

Walking the Red Carpet with Mubarak in Days Gone By

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

You know it’s bad when the new world order “White House” directed mass media agencies begin to tell the truth about the cluelessness, insulated narcissism and inept  foreign policy of the Obama administration.

Imagine: everything that tea party blogs and truth researchers have been screaming on the internet for five years now about this man, this calculatedly aloof and inept President, who pretended he was America’s new political Messiah four years ago, is finally, four years too late, being discussed in “official” American media outlets. I could just shake the men and women at Newsweek, clanking their heads together.

Where was all this truthful reporting with “eyes wide open” when we needed it four years ago? I personally hope Newsweek goes out of business in karmic retribution for their absolute and purposed failing to vet and investigate this man four years ago when he came out of far left field, [where he lives], to run for national office, three years after admitting to reporters he did not have the experience to do so.

The mass media numbskulls who elected this man now have the sad and silly karmic duty of reporting on his collapsing presidency to the nation, as if we didn’t already know. We were all three to four years ahead of you, Newsweek. You are so fired.

Chase Kyla Hunter

Cited:

Wanted: A Grand Strategy for America [ Formerly Titled: “Egypt: How Obama Blew It”

NEWSWEEK’s new columnist on Obama’s Egypt debacle and the vacuum it exposes.

President Barack Obama in front of the Sphinx during a tour of the Great Pyramids of Giza following his landmark speech to the Muslim World on June 4, 2009. Barack Obama Strikes A Pose in Egypt: He Would Have made A Better Gucci Model Than A President. Photo courtesy of Mandel Ngan / AFP-Getty Images

President Barack Obama in front of the Sphinx during a tour of the Great Pyramids of Giza following his landmark speech to the Muslim World on June 4, 2009.

“The statesman can only wait and listen until he hears the footsteps of God resounding through events; then he must jump up and grasp the hem of His coat, that is all.” Thus Otto von Bismarck, the great Prussian statesman who united Germany and thereby reshaped Europe’s balance of power nearly a century and a half ago.

Last week, for the second time in his presidency, Barack Obama heard those footsteps, jumped up to grasp a historic opportunity … and missed it completely.

In Bismarck’s case it was not so much God’s coattails he caught as the revolutionary wave of mid-19th-century German nationalism. And he did more than catch it; he managed to surf it in a direction of his own choosing. The wave Obama just missed—again—is the revolutionary wave of Middle Eastern democracy. It has surged through the region twice since he was elected: once in Iran in the summer of 2009, the second time right across North Africa, from Tunisia all the way down the Red Sea to Yemen. But the swell has been biggest in Egypt, the Middle East’s most populous country.

In each case, the president faced stark alternatives. He could try to catch the wave, Bismarck style, by lending his support to the youthful revolutionaries and trying to ride it in a direction advantageous to American interests. Or he could do nothing and let the forces of reaction prevail. In the case of Iran, he did nothing, and the thugs of the Islamic Republic ruthlessly crushed the demonstrations. This time around, in Egypt, it was worse. He did both—some days exhorting Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to leave, other days drawing back and recommending an “orderly transition.”

The result has been a foreign-policy debacle. The president has alienated everybody: not only Mubarak’s cronies in the military, but also the youthful crowds in the streets of Cairo. Whoever ultimately wins, Obama loses. And the alienation doesn’t end there. America’s two closest friends in the region—Israel and Saudi Arabia—are both disgusted. The Saudis, who dread all manifestations of revolution, are appalled at Washington’s failure to resolutely prop up Mubarak. The Israelis, meanwhile, are dismayed by the administration’s apparent cluelessness.

Last week, while other commentators ran around Cairo’s Tahrir Square, hyperventilating about what they saw as an Arab 1989, I flew to Tel Aviv for the annual Herzliya security conference. The consensus among the assembled experts on the Middle East? A colossal failure of American foreign policy.

This failure was not the result of bad luck. It was the predictable consequence of the Obama administration’s lack of any kind of coherent grand strategy, a deficit about which more than a few veterans of U.S. foreign policy making have long worried. The president himself is not wholly to blame. Although cosmopolitan by both birth and upbringing, Obama was an unusually parochial politician prior to his election, judging by his scant public pronouncements on foreign-policy issues.

Yet no president can be expected to be omniscient. That is what advisers are for. The real responsibility for the current strategic vacuum lies not with Obama himself, but with the National Security Council, and in particular with the man who ran it until last October: retired Gen. James L. Jones. I suspected at the time of his appointment that General Jones was a poor choice. A big, bluff Marine, he once astonished me by recommending that Turkish troops might lend the United States support in Iraq. He seemed mildly surprised when I suggested the Iraqis might resent such a reminder of centuries of Ottoman Turkish rule.

The best national-security advisers have combined deep knowledge of international relations with an ability to play the Machiavellian Beltway game, which means competing for the president’s ear against the other would-be players in the policymaking process: not only the defense secretary but also the secretary of state and the head of the Central Intelligence Agency. No one has ever done this better than Henry Kissinger. But the crucial thing about Kissinger as national-security adviser was not the speed with which he learned the dark arts of interdepartmental turf warfare. It was the skill with which he, in partnership with Richard Nixon, forged a grand strategy for the United States at a time of alarming geopolitical instability.

The essence of that strategy was, first, to prioritize (for example, détente with the Soviets before human-rights issues within the U.S.S.R.) and then to exert pressure by deliberately linking key issues. In their hardest task—salvaging peace with honor in Indochina by preserving the independence of South Vietnam—Nixon and Kissinger ultimately could not succeed. But in the Middle East they were able to eject the Soviets from a position of influence and turn Egypt from a threat into a malleable ally. And their overtures to China exploited the divisions within the Communist bloc, helping to set Beijing on an epoch-making new course of economic openness.

The contrast between the foreign policy of the Nixon-Ford years and that of President Jimmy Carter is a stark reminder of how easily foreign policy can founder when there is a failure of strategic thinking. The Iranian Revolution of 1979, which took the Carter administration wholly by surprise, was a catastrophe far greater than the loss of South Vietnam.

Remind you of anything? “This is what happens when you get caught by surprise,” an anonymous American official told The New York Times last week. “We’ve had endless strategy sessions for the past two years on Mideast peace, on containing Iran. And how many of them factored in the possibility that Egypt moves from stability to turmoil? None.”

I can think of no more damning indictment of the administration’s strategic thinking than this: it never once considered a scenario in which Mubarak faced a popular revolt. Yet the very essence of rigorous strategic thinking is to devise such a scenario and to think through the best responses to them, preferably two or three moves ahead of actual or potential adversaries. It is only by doing these things—ranking priorities and gaming scenarios—that a coherent foreign policy can be made. The Israelis have been hard at work doing this. All the president and his NSC team seem to have done is to draft touchy-feely speeches like the one he delivered in Cairo early in his presidency.

These were his words back in June 2009:

America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles—principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

Those lines will come back to haunt Obama if, as cannot be ruled out, the ultimate beneficiary of his bungling in Egypt is the Muslim Brotherhood, which remains by far the best organized opposition force in the country—and wholly committed to the restoration of the caliphate and the strict application of Sharia. Would such an outcome advance “tolerance and the dignity of all human beings” in Egypt? Somehow, I don’t think so.

Grand strategy is all about the necessity of choice. Today, it means choosing between a daunting list of objectives: to resist the spread of radical Islam, to limit Iran’s ambition to become dominant in the Middle East, to contain the rise of China as an economic rival, to guard against a Russian “reconquista” of Eastern Europe—and so on. The defining characteristic of Obama’s foreign policy has been not just a failure to prioritize, but also a failure to recognize the need to do so. A succession of speeches saying, in essence, “I am not George W. Bush” is no substitute for a strategy.

Bismarck knew how to choose. He understood that riding the nationalist wave would enable Prussia to become the dominant force in Germany, but that thereafter the No. 1 objective must be to keep France and Russia from uniting against his new Reich. When asked for his opinion about colonizing Africa, Bismarck famously replied: “My map of Africa lies in Europe. Here lies Russia and here lies France, and we are in the middle. That is my map of Africa.”

Tragically, no one knows where Barack Obama’s map of the Middle East is. At best, it is in the heartland states of America, where the fate of his presidency will be decided next year, just as Jimmy Carter’s was back in 1980.

At worst, he has no map at all.

John Bolton Essay Indicts Obama Presidency on National Security

Copyright 12.10.2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter

The piece below by John Bolton actually stopped me in my tracks. It’s funny how another writer’s observations will often help to coalesce one’s own discomfort with a situation.  I have taken an unpopular position for an internet pro and citizen journalist blogger regarding Wikileaks, in that I feel what Julian Assange did was both narcissistic, shortsighted and reckless.

The ends do not justify his means and actions in my opinion. I am well aware that thousands of other “truthers” do not feel this way, but when it comes right down to genetic patriotism, the Cherokee Warrior Queen and American patriot in me trumps the internet blogger who was mildly intrigued by absolute unfettered free spewing of  ” FED diplomatic cables”. As a truth researcher of 20 years experience, finding ugly little piles of lies buried somewhere under a false flag event is just another day’s work. Why should the content of those cables be anything that would even surprise someone like me? It’s just another day in the life… I haven’t much bothered to study them.

For me, the bottom line is this:  I don’t want to see my country hurt and humiliated any more than it has been to date in this charade of a presidency with Obama as the hood ornament. There is a huge part of me that is standing aside and watching this melee who doesn’t buy the story as it’s being told anyway. Our government “allows” certain things to take place for their own good reasons. Look at what the FED is gaining in all this: perfect justification to crack down like never before on internet free speech, the free and relatively private process of registering and administering a domain name, I could cite dozens more benefits for a fascist leaning FED that is salivating to take over the web and run it with the efficiency of Obama’s socialized medicine. I can almost hear the elites rubbing their hands together in glee in Washington, NYC, UK while they watch these “cyber-riots” spreading over the web. It’s most likely exactly what they wanted all along, and they will use these events as more pretext to strip away civil liberties online when the dust settles.

Further, my political science mind clearly knows that what Assange did in releasing those cables has imperiled the American nation. That is MY nation, MY America, MY American friends and neighbors, and after all, Assange really has no clue about who and what America is if he did not grow up here on the mainland, native born. We all have before us daily the peculiar new world odor of our own President’s utter lack of interest in defending American interests, religious heritage, or national security in a sudden event like Wikileaks latest disclosures. They should have seen this coming. It was not as if we were not warned by Assange’s earlier actions. But John Bolton points out that funny uncomfortable, “who’s in charge?” feeling, that sense of navigational drift that now emanates from the Obama presidency.

It was as if in reading his piece, my subconscious fixed finally on the point of “Oh, so I am not the only person who feels very uncomfortable with how this Wikileaks / Assange mess is all being so adroitly NON-handled” by the White House.”

When you choose to go white water rafting with a group of strangers, you look around rather nervously to see who will be sitting at the lead point in the raft, calling out the instructions for how to keep the thing afloat and above water all the way down. Barack Obama stopped calling out those instructions to the nation a long time ago, in fact, it occurs he never did take the safety first defensive position for our country. It’s just a very deep gut feeling I have that his inner contempt for America and true American values is now really starting to spill over into all kinds of decision making moments when the moment comes, and goes, and no decision is the action taken. It’s surreal politically, and strategically rather self loathing, perhaps even self destructive.

I’ll just be honest. I want his presidency to end, and sooner rather than later. Barack Obama’s style of empty looking glass leadership is really hurting America. Everyone everywhere who is awake at the helm can feel it. And John Bolton [not that I am particularly a fan, he’s in the UN globalist fan club from way back ] just gave voice to some of my deepest worries and concerns. Thanks John. Oddly, I don’t feel much better now.

Chase Kyla Hunter, the Witness

Article reference:

John Bolton: “Barack Obama is a bigger danger than WikiLeaks”

Also Noteworthy from the WSJ:

We have not in our lifetimes seen a president in this position. He spent his first year losing the center, which elected him, and his second losing his base, which is supposed to provide his troops. There isn’t much left to lose! Which may explain Tuesday’s press conference.

Observing the State of Obama’s Mental Health: What’s Wrong?

President Barack Obama confers with Federal Re...

Image via Wikipedia

Copyright 11.22.2010-3010 By Chase Kyla Hunter Supporting re-post courtesy World Net Daily at http://www.wnd.com

Is Barack Obama Mentally Unstable? His Bizarre Comment Made on Air force One Stunned Those Close By

I had already logged off from reporting today [it is Sunday after all] when I ran across this item that seemed important. Two years ago I wrote rather extensively about my observations of Barack Obama’s personal narcissism, and the clinical symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

In brief, when the personality of Barack Obama is lined up with the clinical checklist of psychiatric symptoms displayed by persons who suffer from NPD, he fits the checklist at about 80%. Of course we bloggers who observe these things are often reviled for such speculation. But there are more serious reasons now to stand back and take a long hard clinical psychiatric look at Barack Obama than there were two years ago, when just about anything that any writer produced which was in any way critical of him was tossed into the broad bucket of “You must be a racist is you disagree with Obama.”

I have been gravely concerned about the man and his screaming NPD symptoms since I first laid eyes on him. I have had some experience in my life with persons who are gripped with NPD, and sadly, the diagnosis is pretty much final, pretty much not treatable, nor can it be reversed or necessarily well managed with medication.

Suffice it to say that someone suffering from this disorder should NOT become the President of the United States, but it is way too late to do anything about that now.

Below is the article from today’s World Net Daily website. Apparently many more observers are now noticing and commenting on some things that I noticed a very long time ago, back in the spring and summer of 2008.

Chase Kyla Hunter on.11.21.2010

Earlier in 2008, 2009 I wrote……

Obama The Beautiful Frankenstein King

Related:

[August 2008] Obama: Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic? By Sam Vaknin Ph.D.

From World Net Daily:  Is Obama Unhinged?

Obama going off the deep end

12 April 2010 by lockdoc1 on Secondhand Soapbox
…  of PJTV Media maintains that Obama is showing signs of mental illness. A wide variety of commentators have observed that Obama …  occurred in front of a friendly audience. Overall, Barack Obama seems to be slipping into a slightly more delusional state these …

Barack Obama – Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?

Barack Obama – Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic? The Global Politician ^ | 13 …  appears to be a narcissist. Granted, only a qualified mental health diagnostician (which I am not) can determine whether someone suffers …


OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL

Is Obama unhinged?

Quip about landing Air Force 1 in Chavez backyard stuns press


Posted: November 21, 2010
6:53 pm Eastern

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

U.S. President Barack Obama (R) smiles as Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron checks documents during a NATO-Russia Council meeting at the NATO Summit in Lisbon November 20, 2010.          REUTERS/Paul Hanna (PORTUGAL - Tags: POLITICS MILITARY)

WASHINGTON – On the flight home from the European Summit today, Barack Obama stopped in the press cabin of Air Force 1 and joked that he was stopping the plane in South America to see Hugo Chavez.

That according to CNN’s Ed Henry, who Tweeted the message to anyone who might be paying attention, editorializing that the president appeared to be “a little punchy.”

Chavez is known as a leading anti-American socialist leader in Venezuela.

Within minutes the blogosphere was aflame with concerns not only about the propriety of the remark but about Obama’s state of mind.

The flippant remark wasn’t the only trigger for such concerns:

  • Shortly after his meeting with European Union leaders, Obama offhandedly remarked: “This summit was not as exciting as other summits.”
  • Some observe he seems distant from the nation’s economic challenges, the rising tide of anger sweeping the country over enhanced airport security checks and the secrecy over what top military officials characterize as an unexplained missile launch over Southern California Nov. 8.
  • Pundits and talk-show hosts, including Rush Limbaugh and top-rated Sean Hannity, have cited White House sources as saying the president is “unhinged,” “detached,” “bored,” “losing it” and obsessed with critics.

“There are some Democrats that cue me into things,” said Hannity on his show Thursday. “The feeling among some people in the White House is that this president is unhinged, that he’s detached, that he’s losing it, he’s obsessed with critics, very specifically obsessed with Fox News, he can’t stand [Vice President Joe] Biden, he hates the Clintons, the Clintons hate him. Infighting, apparently, and finger pointing is at an all-time high; if the president is brought bad news on the economy, he has a meltdown every time he hears it. And this is what people – and I’m telling you, my sources are reliable – are telling me.”

Millions of Americans sense there is something very wrong with the president of the United States, but they don’t know exactly what. “The Manchurian President” answers that question. Now available autographed at WND’s Superstore!

Before Air Force 1 landed, American bloggers were weighing in through cyberspace with their opinions of the latest remark from Obama:

  • “Is he finally losing it? I think that people who joke and laugh about inappropriate things, or at inappropriate times are having trouble dealing with something.”
  • “The guy is certifiable.”
  • “He must be bored again.”
  • “If CNN is noticing Obama is mentally ill, that’s a big deal. CNN has to be careful or get their press card pulled. They are being as open as they can be.”
  • “He’s cracking. By spring he’ll be a complete mess.”
  • “‘Punchy’ is an interesting choice of words. It usually means drunk to the point of being stupid. That seems to fit the context.”

Hannity’s comments can be heard below:

Related Articles
Related Articles