Tagged: World Wide Web

The Human Form as Florals, Digital Art, Illustration, Renderings

The Human Form as A Floral, Digital Renderings

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

Anonymous Digital Renderings Circulated on the Web in Early 2011.

These anonymous digital renderings circulated the web in early January 2011, and employ a high level of creativity and Photoshop skills. I thought they were spectacular and wanted to post them for others to enjoy. They fall under the blanket copyright of all content posted on my blogs. I have reason to believe they may have originated in the Mideast. These, to me, are especially novel and delightful.

CK Hunter

Advertisements

Yahoo.com’s Email Privacy Policies, Datamining Accounts Without Your Consent

Headquarters of Yahoo! next to Mathilda Avenue...

Yahoo's Headquarters in California

Copyright 2011-3011 Alternative News Forum, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy is disappearing on the web, and the only real way to avoid having details about your life posted without your permission or consent is to NOT use the internet. Since many millions now depend on the web, this is not an option that works. I recently found out that all my yahoo.com emails were being read by someone, somewhere, on their back end, and the salient details about me were being harvested from them. This is also called “data mining.”

I was in a dialogue with a distant relative via email. This relative had not seen or heard from me in 20 years. I temporarily forgot where I was during our email exchange [which was on Yahoo.com email ] and told her my age.

Within 48 hours my age appeared in my Youtube.com channel, without my consent, without my permission and without me even knowing it until I logged and found it posted. I quickly deduced where this information had been datamined from. Someone from Yahoo.com had provided it to Google, which owns Youtube and it appeared in my Youtube account so quickly I was stunned. And furious too.

I need to warn all readers and subscribers not to EVER discuss anything of a private or confidential nature on yahoo.com email. Your emails are being archived, examined and harvested for details about you with each send.

I learned the hard way. What made this worse is that there is NO function now operative in the new youtube.com settings where you can remove your age from their database. Now every time I log into youtube my channel is hammered with ads for a certain age group that I have no interest whatsoever in viewing or clicking. Below are yahoo.com’s protocols for “deactivating” and then eventually deleting your account. All information that passed through the account, as far as I can tell from their statements, may be stored on their servers indefinitely. Not good.

Here it is. Read, and learn.

CK Hunter

Data Storage and Anonymization

In order to provide products and services, Yahoo! collects and stores information from user account registration and site usage. Yahoo!’s policy is to de-identify user log file data within 90 days of collection, with limited exceptions to fight fraud, secure systems, and meet legal obligations. Yahoo! takes additional steps so that data collected and used to customize interest based advertising and some content on Yahoo! are not associated with personally identifiable information. Yahoo! is committed to continuous improvements and implementation of our data protection and de-identification measures.  We describe the data we store, our processes and your choices in more detail here.

Account Information

  • When you register with Yahoo! or submit information to Yahoo!, a temporary copy of that information is routinely made to prevent accidental loss of your information through a computer malfunction or human error.
  • Yahoo! keeps your account information active in our user registration databases in order to provide immediate access to your personalization preferences each time you visit Yahoo!.
  • If you ask Yahoo! to delete your Yahoo! account, in most cases your account will be deactivated and then deleted from our user registration database in approximately 90 days. This delay is necessary to discourage users from engaging in fraudulent activity.
  • Please note that any information that we have copied may remain in back-up storage for some period of time after your deletion request. This may be the case even though no account information remains in our active user databases.

Servers Log Files

  • The Yahoo! computers (called “servers”) that send your web pages and advertising banners process and store an enormous amount of information every day. These computer records are called “log files”.
  • Log files are used for analysis, research, auditing, and other purposes, as described above. After this information has been used, it is stored and is inaccessible. Until the information is stored, your Yahoo! ID may remain in our active server log files.

Anonymization/de-identification

  • Anonymization is a process of removing or replacing personal identifiers in data records so that the resulting data is no longer personally identifiable. This is also referred to as de-identification. We use these terms interchangeably.
  • Yahoo! uses a multi-step process to replace, truncate, or delete identifiers in order to de-identify data.

Log file anonymization

  • Yahoo!’s anonymization policy applies to user log file data and includes searches, ad views, ad clicks, page views and page clicks.
  • Yahoo! stores this data in an identifiable form for up to 90 days for most log file data.
  • There are certain exceptions to this policy. Yahoo! will store a limited amount of log file data in identifiable form for up to 6 months for select log file systems involved in product and financial fraud detection and abuse management. There are also exceptions for legal obligations.

Your Interests and Yahoo!

  • Yahoo collects and maintains information about your interests based on your web surfing activity when you are visiting the branded Yahoo! network of web sites as well as when you are visiting other websites in the Yahoo! advertising network.
  • Yahoo! maintains information in both identifiable and de-identified forms. When you are signed-in to the Yahoo! network, Yahoo! associates your observed interests and activity with your Yahoo! account.
    • When you log in to your Yahoo! account, a cookie is placed on that computer which contains information about your interests. This is stored on the hard drive of whatever computer or device you are using when you log in. Your browsing habits on your work computer or a library computer may affect the kinds of advertisements you see when using your home computer.
    • Information that Yahoo! collects related to your activities and interests on and off the Yahoo! network is maintained by Yahoo! on its servers and is associated with Yahoo! cookies regardless of what computer or device you use to sign in to Yahoo!.
    • If you are a Yahoo! registered user who is not signed-in, Yahoo! will continue to store information about your interests based on a unique browser cookie. This cookie is an encrypted (or “one-way secret hashed”) form of a Yahoo! cookie that is de-identified from your Yahoo! account information. This de-identified cookie cannot be used by any third-parties to identify you.
    • When you are not signed in to Yahoo!, Yahoo! will use this encrypted cookie and its stored associated interest information, to match advertisements and content to your interests.

Your Preference and Opt-out Choices

  • To see and/or customize the information that Yahoo! has stored about interests that we use for advertising customization, you can visit our Ad Interest Manager. Ad Interest Manager allows you to opt out of one or more specific interest categories or opt out of all interest-based ads that Yahoo! serves.
  • Yahoo! refreshes cookie information for registered Yahoo! users each and every time you log in to Yahoo! on whichever computer or device you are using at that time. Accordingly, if you do not want Yahoo! to store your interests to deliver more relevant advertising, deleting your cookies will not be an effective way to express this choice. Instead, you should use the persistent opt-out that Yahoo! provides for you. If you are signed-in when you exercise the opt-out, your opt-out cookie will be refreshed each time you log in to Yahoo! – even if you have had previously deleted your cookies and/or moved to a new computer.
  • You can visit the Network Advertising Initiative site to see other networks that you may want to opt-out of or to use other tools to manage your opt-out choices.

Web Inventor Tim Berners-Lee Doesn’t Like Facebook, Neither Does Gmail, Neither Do I

Copyright 2010-3010 By Chase Kyla Hunter, Re-posts permitted leaving content and links intact.

Next month will mark the 20th anniversary of the day that the very first web page appeared on fledgling global computer networks, soon to be christened the “world wide web.” Our planet has been completely transformed by the invention of computer scientist and CERN technician Tim Berners-Lee in 1990.

The world wide web went live, on my physical desktop in Geneva, Switzerland, in December 1990. It consisted of one Web site and one browser, which happened to be on the same computer. The simple setup demonstrated a profound concept: that any person could share information with anyone else, anywhere. In this spirit, the Web spread quickly from the grassroots up. Today, at its 20th anniversary, the Web is thoroughly integrated into our daily lives. We take it for granted, expecting it to “be there” at any instant, like electricity. – Tim Berners-Lee

[ See “long Live the Web” by Berners-Lee ]

Today, however the global democratic and egalitarian nature of the world wide web is threatened by social networking behemoths like Facebook, which in effect, walls off the collected member data which is entered into the site, prohibiting this data from being made accessible by other portals online. Try to imagine if 90% of every city and town in America became some sort of “members only” gated community practically overnight. People who were not “members” suddenly would be unable to drive the roads which were now “owned” by these 5 or 6 gated communities, thus forcing people who needed to drive to get somewhere to join these communities, and divulge their private information, whether they wanted to or not.

That, in the digital sense of the word, is exactly what Facebook is now forcing onto the rest of the internet. If I want to see what Facebook user has linked to my blog from their page on Facebook, I am forced to join Facebook, which I refuse to do for about a hundred good sensible reasons. Here’s what Tim Berners-Lee has to say about the troubling issue that sites like Facebook present to the freedom of the internet:

The Web as we know it, however, is being threatened in different ways. Some of its most successful inhabitants have begun to chip away at its principles. Large social-networking sites are walling off information posted by their users from the rest of the Web. Wireless Internet providers are being tempted to slow traffic to sites with which they have not made deals. Governments—totalitarian and democratic alike—are monitoring people’s online habits, endangering important human rights.

If we, the Web’s users, allow these and other trends to proceed unchecked, the Web could be broken into fragmented islands. We could lose the freedom to connect with whichever Web sites we want. The ill effects could extend to smartphones and pads, which are also portals to the extensive information that the Web provides. Tim Berners-Lee

It is of the utmost importance that intelligent and farseeing discussions begin to examine now, what the ultimate outcome and consequences may be in another 20 years for the overall health, freedom, democracy and well being of the internet, as mega-sites like Facebook continue to grow and dominate the web landscape. I can actually foresee a strange new “first internet” twenty years from now which is nothing more than a gigantic digital continent, which is walled off from the rest of the web, called , and I am being facetious here, oh, let’s say: “Facebook Fantasy Island.” This digital monarchy now sits squarely in the middle of world cyberspace with 4 billion users, relegating the rest of the internet to an inferior and secondary tier of status, bandwidth, and information access. Those digital outsiders who have valued their privacy, refusing to join the behemoth, now use a second tier smaller “internet” that is excluded from the gargantuan ongoing “big brother supervised digital block party” which will have finally become Facebook by the year 2030.

Readers may think I am exaggerating wildly, but I do so to make a point. When there is ultimately, 20 years from now, one privately owned internet mega-portal that has culled the vital data and personal statistics, lifestyle habits, interests, hobbies, book and music lists, movies, family stats, and every other imaginable snippet of personal information that could ever be datamined from 2/3rds of the world’s online population, with their own naive consent, and is holding that data in private digital vaults, dispensing it at will to governments, corporations, and whomever else is willing to pay the asking price for it, then don’t we have the equivalent of global digital socialism?

Those familiar with George Orwell‘s “1984” most likely never imagined that Big Brother might not originate so much with the federal government as it would those firms which learned how to dominate the landscape of the world’s computer networks during the first twenty years of the world wide web. But that is exactly the landscape which I see shaping up in front of me. I am not exactly sure what the solution is at this time.

As long as there are millions of young people who want to date and mate, there will be Facebook. But just exactly how large and overpowering in scope should we allow Facebook to become? When I was still quite young, the federal government broke up the national telephone monopoly known formerly as “Southern Bell Company.” The FED has done the same thing with gas companies and other huge growing monopolies that eventually threatened fair and equitable business practice. Will it eventually come to the same thing with Facebook?

I ask these questions, and pose these scenarios because these questions need to be asked, and the possible eventual scenarios need to be examined. Just exactly how big do we want to allow mega-portals like Facebook to get before the global minds and thinkers of the digital world intervene to keep one internet firm from eventually “owning” the personal data of the majority of worldwide internet users?

The time to study the possible problems, scenarios and outcomes for the internet is now, not twenty years from now, when it may be too little, too late.

Chase Kyla Hunter

See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/20/berners_lee_says_facebook_a_thret_to_web/

Berners-Lee: “Facebook Is A Threat to the Web

A Brief History of the Internet

5 Solid Reasons to Run Like Hell From Facebook’s New Email Messaging

44 Essays on Alternative News Forum That Discuss Facebook