Category: RFID Evil Exposed

How to Remove RFID Chips from Credit Cards, Other Cards

GOP & Tea Party Movement Not Exactly A Match Made in Heaven

Sarah Palin, eleventh governor of Alaska and 2...
Sarah Palin

3.20. 2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter

I began writing about the emerging tea party national coalition last July 2009. You, know during the “we were all astro-turf” period. I’m glad to see that one year later the rest of the nation’s [ahem, so called] journalists have now awakened from their political Rip Van Winkle nap and many news desks have now begun covering this highly significant American grassroots spiritual and political movement with some modicum of respect and accuracy, instead of just fearfully flinging racist pooh, and name calling the movement from behind their fake news desks.

Isn’t it so true, we fear what we fail to comprehend in America? I think, just a hunch, that mainstream America is beginning to awaken to the dire and urgent spiritual and political imperative for the Tea Party Movement to survive and grow in this country. The stakes could not be higher. [Code phrase: “mandatory RFID chips under Obamacare ]

And I DO hate to always say, “see… I told you so…” but I knew last summer that just as soon as the fledgling American Tea Party movement would find it’s sea legs that the listless and now practically impotent and leaderless GOP would try to “lay claim to it” in a desperate attempt to save itself politically, and that because of such a move by the GOP leaders, that all hell would eventually break loose between the two groups.

We’re not quite yet at the “all hell” moment yet, but it’s coming.

There is deep, abiding and justified resentment of the corrupt and misguided GOP by millions of middle Americans, for a multitude of damn good reasons. George W.‘s so called presidency deteriorated into a veritable “lame duck soup” of corrupt Washington D.C. insider misery during his second term, the war dragged on, we all learned the bitter terrible truth about the “WMD” stories, a high level CIA operative’s career was ruined, and one scandal after the next rocked the Bush White House while he played golf, avoided Cindy Sheehan, chortled and made funny faces at CNN cameras. We grew to hate the man we had stood behind right after 9-11.

As for 9-11, don’t get me started. Something deeply wicked and utterly iniquitous was done to the American people that day, by their own government, we all know it and the evidence continues to pile up against the second Bush administration. The subject has been addressed repeatedly by other prominent researchers, investigators, scientists and I believe the operative smoking gun word of the last decade would be “nano thermite.” Google it.

Now come a courting: the GOP seeking to steal some righteous kundalini flame from the first real and genuine grassroots American uprising since the students died and spilled their blood all over the concrete at Kent State University in the 1960s. I wrote about this last summer in an extended and prophetic  piece called:

“Eyes Wide Open Is A State of Mind”

I predicted what would take place as the nascent American Tea party uprising matured, and every single thing I predicted has now come to pass. My message to my Tea Party compatriots is the same one year later as it was last summer 2009: Allow the Holy Spirit to guide you, and Do NOT, I repeat, DO NOT get in bed with the Republican Party. I cannot say this loud enough. My soul is screaming it. Please hear me.

Can the Tea Party survive on it’s own? Absolutely.

Will the Tea Party movement ultimately prevail in spite of being reviled by the left, wooed and courted for a sleazy “shot gun wedding” by the right, and mocked and ridiculed by everyone else who’s clueless in the middle? Yep. It sure will. We are literally in a Divine intervention scenario here, and the very heart and soul of the country is now at stake. This is no longer about any of the silly “I’m gonna weep over it” antics of TV “clown for hire” Glenn Beck, but now runs more along the lines of the thinking of Michael Savage, Sarah Palin and Andrew Breitbart. Obamacare’s national ID cards will lead us straight into the “stand in line to get your mandatory RFID chip” George Orwell reality, and that reality is NOT God’s Will for this nation. Her citizens know it too.

The Holy Spirit and the worldwide Spirit of Truth are the underlying spiritual currents prodding the American Tea Party movement, and no one, I repeat NO ONE second guesses the hidden hand of God when the soul of a great nation is at stake. This is no more about “organized religion” than a trout represents a stump in the road.

This now goes deeper than religion and higher than any preacher in his pulpit, with all his well intended misunderstandings. This is about what God’s Will Is for America in the next 10 years, and in the next 1,000 years. Let he/she who has eyes, see what I am saying here.

Listen to the deep deep instincts, en masse, that are prompting you to stand aside and turn down the GOP shotgun wedding.

Let God show the Tea Party movement which way the wind needs to blow next. He will show you how to proceed.

Chase Kyla Hunter

Read Related article:

Brewing tensions between the Tea Party and GOP

MANISTEE, Mich./WACO, Texas/WASHINGTON
Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:13am EDT

Main Image
Main Image
Main Image
Main Image
Main Image
Main Image

MANISTEE, Mich./WACO, Texas/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Some Tea Partiers say they can pinpoint the precise moment when they made it clear to the Republican Party they had no intention of being its lapdog.

U.S. |  Barack Obama

On a bright, brisk afternoon in mid-February, with snow still thick on the ground from storms that had battered Washington the week before, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele met with more than 50 members of the Tea Party, the Twitter Age conservative movement that is reshaping the U.S. political landscape.

Steele, RNC chairman since January 2009, had invited them to the plush Capitol Hill Club, built as a clubhouse for the party’s top brass next door to RNC headquarters.

According to several accounts, not long into the meeting JoAnn Abbott, an activist from Virginia who calls herself the ‘Tea Party Grandma,’ raised her hand to ask a question.

She asked about a web page on the RNC site where visitors could send their member of Congress a postcard with a tea bag. On the tag at the end of the string were the letters ‘RNC.’

“Respectfully, sir, while we do not have a trademark on the tea bag, you are well aware that people associate it with the Tea Party movement,” Abbott, 50, recalls saying to Steele. “If you co-opt that image, you damage our brand and weaken our movement.”

Lest there was any confusion, she added: “It does not belong to you, it belongs to us as an independent movement.”

Abbott said within an hour of the end of the meeting the page (www.teaparty.gop.com) was gone — and the Grand Old Party was finally aware of conservative frustrations she and others felt with Republican leadership.

“The GOP now knows we’re not asleep anymore,” Abbott told Reuters. “The giant has been awakened.”

RNC officials said Steele, who according to Abbott and others agreed at the time to hold regional meetings with Tea Party groups around the country, was traveling and unable to comment for this story.

But on Fox News the day after the meeting, Steele described the meeting as part of a “healing process” with people disaffected with Republican leaders. Part of the process includes “acknowledging where we have gone wrong, where we have made the mistakes in spending, in growing the size of government, in stepping away from those very constitutional principles and values that have certainly defined this party,” he said.

CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVES

Accounts of that February 16 meeting challenge a common perception that the Tea Party movement was founded, funded and dominated by the Republican Party. Most of them are current or former Republicans — up to 80 percent or more, with the rest split between Democrats, independents and Libertarians. And the movement has received help from conservative groups like FreedomWorks, which has provided training and logistical support to Tea Party groups and hopes the movement will boost fiscal conservatives in congressional midterm elections.

But Tea Partiers insist that they are not beholden to the GOP and warn that Republican candidates counting on an endorsement from them in November may well be disappointed.

Interviews with Tea Partiers across the country paint a picture of a genuine, amorphous, conservative grassroots movement united by three core principles: constitutionally limited government, free market ideology and low taxes. The American Constitution is a rallying cry and many now dub themselves “constitutional conservatives.”

They are angry not just at what they describe as the socialist policies of U.S. President Barack Obama. They also feel Republican politicians have betrayed the party’s ideals. For many in the movement, purging the party of moderate Republicans is a major goal.

“I used to be a dyed-in-the-wool Republican. Now if we have a Republican lined up to come to our meetings, I don’t even want to go,” said Nate Friedl, 41, a member of the Rock River Patriots, a Tea Party group in southern Wisconsin.

Following a first year marked by protests, the movement is evolving. The political novices of a year ago are forming coalitions and learning how to change things from the ground up.

After rallying against government bailouts and Obama’s healthcare reforms, as well as mobilizing the vote for key electoral races such as Republican Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts in January, many Tea Partiers feel empowered.

“Tea Party people have realized that you cannot change the system by protesting on the outside,” said Richard Viguerie, author of ‘Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause.’

The movement is also debating whether to remain independent — or stage a conservative takeover of the Republican Party. And some, a tiny minority, favor becoming a third party.

“The two-party system is too ingrained in America,” said Rod Merrill, head of the Ludington Tea Party in western Michigan. “Every time someone has tried to form a third party, it has failed.”

An Ipsos/Reuters poll shows that although a majority of Democrats and a plurality of independents voters would support Tea Party candidates, less than one third of Republicans would support them as a third party.

Regardless of the debate’s outcome, Tea Partiers are targeting not just prominent Democrats in the midterms but also key moderate Republicans like Charlie Crist in Florida and former presidential candidate John McCain in Arizona. United as never before by the internet and weekly conference calls, conservatives are eyeing a few “national” primary races.

“The Tea Party movement needs champions,” said Larry Sabato, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia. “They have to be able to say ‘We’re the reason they got elected.’ Otherwise the movement may dissipate.”

The Tea Party movement has resonated with many Americans, as demonstrated by a March 15 Rasmussen Reports poll putting Tea Party candidates in third place with 21 percent approval among voters behind the Republicans at 27 percent and the Democrats at 34 percent. A December poll had put the movement in second place ahead of the Republicans.

Some Republican politicians have actively courted Tea Partiers, whose fiscal conservative focus is close to the Republicans’ stated principles. Democrat politicians have largely shunned the movement.

“This year the momentum is away from the Democrats as they’re the party in power, so Republican candidates espousing Tea Party views in general have a better chance in the midterms,” Sabato said. “But movements like this have come and gone before, so it’s still too early to say if the movement will survive long term.”

In the near term, the mostly white movement faces a possible showdown with the religious right over divisive social issues. But its biggest challenge lies in tackling its extremist fringe, including those who equate Obama with Hitler and the “birther” movement that doubts Obama’s U.S. citizenship and the legitimacy of his presidency.

“The majority of Americans can agree with the core principles of the Tea Party movement,” said Ned Ryun, president of American Majority, a conservative group that has provided training programs for Tea Party groups. “But if it allows itself to be defined by its extremist fringe, then it’s lost.”

THIS REVOLUTION WILL BE TELEVISED

Around 11pm local time on November 4, 2008, America’s first black president-elect strode out onto a stage in Grant Park in downtown Chicago and told a cheering crowd of about 250,000 that “change has come to America.”

Some 40 miles away in the suburb of Grayslake, local businesswoman Janelle Nagy sat up in bed watching Obama’s victory speech in horror, her bedcovers tucked tightly under her chin.

“I told my husband how afraid I was for America,” she said, her hands held close to her face as if still clutching a blanket like a scared child. “Obama said he wants to fundamentally change America. But I don’t want to fundamentally change this country.”

“I love America the way it is,” added Nagy, now a leader of the Northern Illinois Patriots.

Tea Partiers across the country recall a growing sense of anger well before presidential election night in 2008, as outgoing President George W. Bush helped prop up the teetering U.S. financial sector amid the worst downturn since the 1930s and issued emergency loans to struggling automakers General Motors and Chrysler. Under Obama, the government took stakes in both companies.

“I remember just screaming at the TV,” said Tanya Bachand, 35, a trial lawyer and Connecticut state coordinator for the Tea Party Patriots. “I was frustrated long before Obama came along because of how much the government grew under Bush. To me Obama was like Bush, only much worse.”

The moment that launched the Tea Party came a shortly after Obama took office. On cable business channel CNBC, on February 19, host Rick Santelli launched into an impromptu tirade from his regular slot at the Chicago Board of Trade against plans to help struggling homeowners. Santelli proposed a tea party in Chicago in July to protest government bailouts.

This was a reference to the Boston Tea Party, an act of protest against the British government over taxation in 1773, a moment that has resonated throughout American history.

“The Rant,” as Santelli’s monologue has become known, struck a chord with conservatives.

“If we hadn’t had all of those bailouts the economy would be back on track by now,” said Tina Dupont, a founding member of the Tea Party of West Michigan. “The jobs would be back, companies would be coming back. If they’d let the banks and others collapse, we would have had a short, sharp downturn.”

The consensus among economists is that had the U.S. government and Federal Reserve not propped up the markets, a global depression would likely have ensued. Yet Dupont and others profess an unshakable belief in the power of the free market. To them, government intervention makes crises only worse. They argue runaway government spending threatens America’s future.

Tea Partiers say Santelli spoke to a deep-seated anger among conservatives who felt betrayed by the Republican politicians they had believed in. Many want big government spending programs like social security scrapped.

“Social security is socialism,” said Jim Chase, 80, a retiree on social security, who is a member of the Ludington Tea Party. “If we don’t stop all this spending, we won’t have anything left for our grandchildren.”

Chase said he would rather have a system where Americans were able to invest their social security payments themselves, an idea not unlike President Bush’s proposal to privatize social security. So when Santelli let rip, fiscal conservatives were eager to answer the call.

“It wasn’t like all of a sudden we woke up and said we need a Tea Party,” said Amy Kremer, 49, one of the founders of the Atlanta Tea Party. “This came after years of rumblings through the conservative world. The fuel was already there and he (Santelli) just lit the fuse.”

A small group of conservatives on Twitter instantly took up the Tea Party theme and in a conference call on February 20 they planned tea parties for the following week. On Friday February 27, 2009, a total of 48 tea parties were held around the country and coordinators estimated turnout at 35,000 people.

Mark Meckler, 48, a lawyer in Sacramento and independent who was a Republican until eight years ago, threw a party on February 27 thinking he would have six attendees. Instead, 150 people showed up.

“That inspired me to keep going,” he said.

Jenny Beth Martin, a former Republican activist in Atlanta, was on the original conference call and said after the surprising success of February 27, a second round was planned for April 15, the day American’s taxes are due. Activists used Facebook to spread the word.

“It went viral,” said Brendan Steinhauser, director of federal and state campaigns at FreedomWorks. “It was a beautiful moment for us because it’s not like you could create that if you wanted to.”

FreedomWorks, which is in frequent contact with up to 2,000 local leaders, estimates 3 million to 5 million people have participated in Tea Party meetings or donated money.

Martin said according to local organizers, on April 15 some 1.2 million people attended 850 tea parties. Martin and Meckler are now national coordinators of the Tea Party Patriots, a grouping of more than 1,200 local Tea Party groups.

Following the early rallies, the Tea Party movement evolved quickly, cheered on avidly by right wing commentators, above all Glenn Beck on cable channel Fox News.

“The past year has been like drinking out of a fire hydrant,” Martin said. “Everything has moved so fast.”

Early on Tea Partiers found an enduring target in the Obama administration’s attempts to reform the healthcare system.

Highly publicized and frequently angry confrontations with members of Congress at “town hall” meetings in the summer became a hallmark of the Tea Party’s first year.

“I WAS NOT ALONE”

A common thread to tales of Tea Partiers is that in the early months they discovered others felt the same and, all of a sudden, they felt empowered.

Tanya Bachand traveled to New York for the February 27 Tea Party event in New York and was surprised at how many conservatives there were in a liberal city. “I didn’t even vote in the last midterm elections because I felt so disillusioned,” she said. “But all of a sudden I felt I was not alone.”

Bachand returned to Connecticut and started her own Tea Party group. She recalls an early meeting where a biker, a preacher and a businessman in a suit sat together on her living room couch.

“They had absolutely nothing in common, except they wanted to do what’s right for this country,” she said.

Bachand’s group teamed up with others in the state — from gun rights to anti-abortion groups — to form the Connecticut Patriot Alliance. “Everybody in the alliance has their own particular bugaboo,” she said. “But we all agree on the Constitution, so we work together on the big issues.”

They focused on local Senator Chris Dodd, the Democrat chairman of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee. “Every time Chris Dodd set foot in the state, between us we had 50 to 100 people waiting to protest,” Bachand said. “We made a real statement.”

In Waco, Texas, the town’s Tea Party group blocked a local bailout. According to local media reports, in October the Waco City council approved a $700,000 loan to keep a local high-tech firm afloat under new ownership. But when the Waco Tea Party got wind of the decision, they mobilized to prevent it.

“It made me mad,” recalled leadership council member Lisa Dickison, a mild-mannered woman who looks incapable of anger.

Waco Tea Party head Toby Marie Walker said five or six members went to a county commissioner meeting, where the bailout was due to be approved. Walker said their presence alone led the commissioners to stop the bail out.

“We just had to show up and they knew why we were there,” she said.

The healthcare debate is where conservative Tea Partiers feel they have had most impact. They are convinced they forced Republicans into opposing the reform and felt they were a crucial factor in getting Scott Brown elected to the Senate seat left vacant by the death of Ted Kennedy.

“On a conference call in December someone said maybe Brown could win and that we should get behind him,” Meckler of the Tea Party Patriots said. “The idea gained momentum from there.”

People like retirees Calvin and Linda Dykstra wanted to eliminate the Democrats’ 60-seat, filibuster-proof majority that helped healthcare reform pass a vote in late December. They drove from western Michigan to Massachusetts in January and spent a week campaigning for Brown.

Speaking at a Tea Party meeting in Manistee, Michigan, the two beamed and blushed like newlyweds, despite being in their mid-60s. “Not everyone had the time or the money to do what we did, but we felt we had to stop the socialist government takeover of healthcare,” said Calvin, a former physician.

GETTING ORGANIZED

As the movement has grown, coalitions have formed. In Michigan, Tea Party groups have formed the Michigan Tea Party Alliance with supporters of Glenn Beck’s 9.12 Project — a conservative group that wants America to resume the spirit of unity of September 12, 2001, the day after the September 11 attacks.

“The movement is beginning to coalesce around a core set of principles — constitutionally limited government, free market ideology and low taxes,” said Tony Raymond, who was laid off at consulting company Accenture in March 2009 and is now a leader of the Northern Illinois Patriots.

The Tea Party Patriots now have two paid national coordinators — Jenny Beth Martin and Mark Meckler — whose salaries come from member contributions. “I only started getting paid last month,” Meckler said. “I went through my life savings to get to this point and my family has really suffered.”

“I was working for the movement 100 hours a week and they either had to start paying me or I’d have to go back to work.”

There is a mentoring program to teach novice local leaders how to organize, as more than 200 new groups have joined them since the beginning of 2010.

Staff at FreedomWorks believe the movement’s expansion is largely behind it, but American Majority’s Ryun said “the Tea Party is going to continue to grow until the country gets back on the right track.”

Other volunteer groups have stepped in to aid conservatives in their quest for ideological purity. Utah-based Independence Caucus, for instance, vets conservative candidates using a questionnaire containing 80 questions based on the U.S. Constitution. Candidates who answer yes to at least 70 percent of those questions are interviewed by local conservatives.

If they pass muster, Independence Caucus backs their candidacy. “But if we find someone is a chameleon and was lying, our policy is we’ll work twice as hard to remove them from office as we did to get them elected,” said Donald Jakel, the group’s coordinator for Ohio and Michigan.

Independence Caucus has vetted at least one candidate in half the state and national seats up for grabs in Michigan.

CONSERVATIVE MACHINE

The efforts of Tea Party movement have also been backed by some well-funded conservative groups.

FreedomWorks, headed by former Republican House Majority leader Dick Armey, says it was involved from the outset. It helped political novices navigate the bureaucratic requirements of holding a protest, including insurance issues and permits.

The group has provided training for television interview, on meeting congressmen and public relations.

Spokesman Adam Brandon said FreedomWorks’ budget in 2009 was $7 million, up to 70 percent from individual donations, up to 25 percent from foundations and the rest from corporations. The group does not name donors but said the foundations were those that typically give to conservative libertarian causes.

In 2006 to 2007 FreedomWorks had zero online donations; in 2009 they had 19,000 individual online donors who contributed more than $500,000 in total.

The group hopes to add up to 15 fiscal conservatives in the House of Representatives this year, plus four in the Senate.

Purcellville, Virginia-based group American Majority has also provided training. It was founded in 2008 with financial backing from the Chicago-based Sam Adams Alliance, which promotes free market principles. Individual conservatives have given as much as $25,000 or as little as $100 each.

The group’s president Ryun said conservative donors are taking a fresh look at the RNC and wondering if their money would be better spent on grassroots conservative groups.

“The Republican grassroots operation is pretty much defunct,” he said. “Conservatives are looking for a better bang for their buck. There is going to be more competition for money that has traditionally gone to the RNC and I for one am going to go after that money, hard.”

FreedomWorks and Our Country Deserves Better, a political action committee that has formed Tea Party Express, have been accused of being GOP operatives, including by other Tea Party groups. But both groups say their money comes from conservatives. Tea Party Express is staffed by people from Russo, Marsh & Associates, founded by Sal Russo, who began his political career as an assistant to Ronald Reagan when he was governor of California. A review of the Federal Election Commission filings from Our Country Deserves Better shows mostly small donations of a few hundred dollars, many of them from retirees.

Joe Wierzbicki of Russo, Marsh & Associates said the GOP was hostile to the Tea Party movement at first. “The response from the party establishment was that this was bad, that this would look like sour grapes and paint conservatives in a poor light,” he said.

More recently, Wierzbicki said the Republican Party has belatedly tried to woo Tea Partiers.

Some Republicans have openly courted the movement, especially Sarah Palin, McCain’s running mate in 2008. She gave the keynote speech at the Tea Party Convention in Nashville in early February. Organized by Tea Party Nation, the event was derided by some other Tea Party groups as being a GOP front.

“We like Sarah Palin, she’s one of us and she speaks to us,” said Tina Dupont of the Tea Party of West Michigan. “But she does not speak for us.” Her views were echoed by many.

Most Republicans are not so popular. “The Republican Party would like to take over the Tea Party and use it to gain power,” Tanya Bachand said. “It’s the other way around and they don’t know what’s coming.”

“Their reckoning is coming.”

The GOP and individual Republican candidates are actively seeking Tea Party endorsements and votes. “At every meeting we have, we see local and state representatives of the Republican Party counting heads and trying to drum up support from our members,” said Nighta Davis, organizer of the North Georgia Patriots. “For six years the Republicans controlled Congress and the White House under Bush and they could have solved this country’s problems. But they did nothing of the kind.”

“Now they want to co-opt us,” she added. “But they just don’t get it.”

Ray Franz, a local Republican politician in western Michigan for three decades, is running for state representative for the 101st district, which includes Manistee.

“The Republicans and the Tea Party movement are on the same page on most issues,” he said at a local Tea Party meeting. “The party has lost its brand and these conservatives are right to want to hold our feet to the fire and make sure we represent them properly.”

Adam Kinzinger won the Republican primary to run for Illinois’ 11th district in the U.S. House of Representatives.

In a blog in early January Eric Odom, executive director of the American Liberty Alliance, described Kinzinger as a “strong” Tea Party candidate and recommended readers consider donating to his campaign.

Kinzinger said his campaign saw a major spike in small donations between $10 and $20 following that blog. “I’m a conservative Republican, and Tea Party people believe in the same things that we do,” he said. “The movement has helped remind the party that it lost track of the Republican principles that I believe in.”

ENDANGERED RINOS

The polarization of U.S. politics may explain why moderate Republicans are in trouble. According to the Pew Research Center, as recently as 2004, 30 percent of Americans were Republicans, but that fell to 23 percent in 2009. Conservatives made up 37 percent in 2004 and ended 2009 at the same level.

According to Gallup, conservatives went from 36 percent of the population in 1992 to 40 percent in 2009, while moderates slid from 43 percent to 36 percent.

Conservatives derisively call moderate Republicans RINOs — Republican In Name Only. They are angry at moderates over issues like immigration and the cap and trade climate bill.

Joe Walsh, a Tea Party Republican who won the Republican primary for 8th U.S. congressional district in Illinois, said conservatives in his district are furious. “The biggest applause I get from audiences comes when I whack the Republicans over the head for doing the same thing as the Democrats,” he said. “This year, party establishment support could be the kiss of death. What will matter this year is the support of the rank and file.”

Ted Schendel, 53, a semi-retired police officer and a Tea Party Republican, is running against “four millionaires” to be the Republican candidate for the 2nd district of Michigan.

“Just before Christmas I was watching Glenn Beck when I realized that Glenn alone cannot take our country back,” he said, speaking at the Manistee Tea party meeting. “So instead of just shouting at the TV, I decided to run for office.”

“I’m not stupid, I know I’ve got one almighty mountain to climb,” he said. “The only way I can do it is if I can get the common man behind me.”

Tea Party Democrats are a rarer breed. Tim Curtis, 53, is a former U.S. Marine who owns a UPS Store franchise and is a member of the Tampa 9.12 Project. He is running as a Democrat for U.S. Congress in Florida’s 11th district.

“There are those who believe in bigger, more costly and more intrusive government,” he said. “That’s not what this country was intended to be. The Tea Party movement cuts across party lines, as there’s more uniting us than separating us.”

According to the Ipsos/Reuters poll, while 49 percent of Republicans said they identify with the Tea Party movement only 11 percent of Democrats said the same.

While there appear to be Tea Party-inspired candidates running as Republicans across the country, there is not yet a clear picture of just how many are out there.

“We’ve heard from a lot of them from around the country, but I don’t think anyone has counted them yet,” said JB Williams, who runs conservative web site www.freedomforce.us. “But we’ll see more of them as the year goes on.”

“This is a movement that is determined to enact change peacefully,” he added. “But if someone tries to stop them, don’t be surprised if they resort to other means.”

Many others are getting involved in local politics to push fiscal conservatism, including at the precinct delegate level. Called a number of different things in different states, this is the lowest elected unit in both political parties. The average precinct represents 1,100 voters. They get out the vote and can influence candidate selection.

Selected in primaries, few people vote in these races.

“In some counties up to 60 percent of these slots are vacant,” said Philip Glass, a commercial mortgage banker and national director of the National Precinct Alliance. This volunteer group is mapping the rules nationwide for becoming a precinct delegate to aid conservatives take these seats. “The tools for taking over both parties are just lying there waiting to be picked up,” he said.

In Connecticut both parties use a town committee system. As a registered Republican, Tanya Bachand went to her Republican town committee and asked how to run. She was told three of the committee’s 12 spots were vacant and was asked to take a seat.

“We have heard the same story many times from across the state,” she said. “This is the way to take over the Republican party from the ground up.”

Tea party conservatives are also paying attention to key races in other states. “Any race in the country can become a national race,” said Tea Party Patriots’ Meckler.

The movement has its sights set on a number of RINOs in this year’s Senate races. They are backing Marco Rubio against Charlie Crist in Florida, Rand Paul (the son of Republican Congressman Ron Paul) against Trey Grayson in Kentucky, Mike Lee in Utah against incumbent Robert Bennett, Chuck DeVore against former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina in California and, last but not least, J.D. Hayworth against McCain.

“Many people in Arizona feel that John McCain has leaned across the aisle,” said Kathy Boatman, a member of the East Valley Tea Party in the Phoenix suburb of Gilbert. “But the only problem is that when he leans across the aisle … they pull him down, and sometimes flat on his face.”

At a Tea Party event in south Miami, everyone favored Rubio, who has a substantial lead over Crist in the polls.

“Charlie Crist is exactly what we don’t want,” said Nancy Meinhardt, a paralegal and a leading light in the Florida Tea Party movement. “He’s a Republican in name only, he’s not a conservative. It’s all a facade.”

While some Tea Party groups endorse candidates, others steadfastly do not. “We leave that to individual groups to decide on a local level whether to endorse someone,” Tea Party Patriots’ Meckler said.

Tea Party candidates did not fare well in the Texas primaries in early March, though James Henson, a politics professor at the University of Texas, said the state is a “low tax, low service, small government environment.”

“Texas is already Tea Party country,” he said. “You’d have to represent some fairly extreme views to push Republicans here further to the right.”

“In the midterms I wouldn’t be surprised to see Tea Party voters hold their noses and vote for the Republican candidates who won the primaries.”

In the primaries in Illinois in early February, with the exception of Joe Walsh, Tea Party candidates fared badly. Tony Raymond of the Northern Illinois Patriots said Tea Partiers were kicking themselves for not getting involved sooner.

“We missed the boat and are now stuck with some candidates we’d rather not vote for,” he said.

Chris Merrill, a conservative radio host in Kansas City, said even if candidates are not running specifically as Tea Party candidates many are running on fiscal conservative platforms. “In some years the Tea Party message would not have resonated like it does this year,” he said. “It’s hard to say how many Tea Party candidates will get elected, but we will see more fiscal conservatives.”

“We’ll have to wait and see whether that will still be the case in 2012.”

BATTLES AHEAD

Of the possible challenges ahead for the Tea Party movement the two main ones are not from the left, but from the right.

The first comes from social conservatives, or the religious right. The Tea Party movement is dominated by fiscal conservatives and leaders like Eric Odom of the American Liberty Alliance say social issues like abortion and gay marriage should be avoided.

When asked about abortion, for instance, Tina Dupont of the Tea Party of West Michigan says the group does not discuss it. “Most of us are probably pro-lifers,” she said. “But we avoid the topic because it is so divisive.”

This has been noted by some on the religious right. “At the national level you have people saying it is all about fiscal issues and not about social issues because they say they are divisive,” said Tony Perkins, president of Christian lobby group the Family Research Council.

Chris Merrill said while Tea Partiers can avoid divisive issues at meetings, they cannot if they run for office. “Running a campaign is different,” he said. “At some point they have to take a stand on social issues.”

Some say a showdown between social and fiscal conservative groups may be inevitable. “Fiscal conservatives want to limit the size of government, social conservatives want to use government to further their agenda,” Henson said. “That will likely cause problems.”

The other problem is the extreme fringe of the Tea Party movement, which was evident at a demonstration outside the Detroit auto show on a snowy day in January. More than half of the 20 or so protesters held signs protesting government bailouts. The rest held placards with black and white pictures of President Obama’s face, with a Hitler mustache added.

Within minutes, both groups had moved to opposite corners of their allotted patch of concrete. Andrew Moylan of the National Taxpayers Union said with evident discomfort he had tried unsuccessfully to get rid of the Obama-as-Hitler posters. “I oppose Obama’s policies vehemently, I don’t agree with what he is trying to do,” he said. “But I believe that he is well-intentioned, even if he is dead wrong.”

“Comparing him to Hitler is not only wrong on so many levels, it also reflects badly on us because all the pictures in the papers and on TV will be of them,” he added. “Our message will get lost in that.”

Those who argued here that Obama is like Hitler say that healthcare reform would grant doctors the power of life and death over patients, as under the Nazi regime.

The movement has also attracted members of the Council of Conservative Citizens, which supports some white supremacist causes, and from the John Birch Society and the LaRouchies. In a February 19 column in the Wall Street Journal, former Bush adviser Karl Rove described both as “fringe groups.”

“If tea party groups are to maximize their influence on policy, they must now begin the difficult task of disassociating themselves from cranks and conspiracy nuts,” Rove wrote. “This includes 9/11 deniers, ‘birthers’ who insist Barack Obama was not born in the United States, and militia supporters espousing something vaguely close to armed rebellion.”

(Additional Reporting by Tim Gaynor, editing by Jim Impoco and Claudia Parsons)

Related:

States Take Aim to Block Obama Healthcare Plan

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

NWO Owned Mass Media Tries to Ignore 3.16 Tea Party Protests in DC [Should We Be Surprised?]

3.16.2010 By Chase K. Hunter….. Covering the “Coverage” – Tedious.

Nancy Pelosi, regarding Obamacare: “It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know.” Rally Nancy? We know all about just how “insider oriented” it is. You are liable and accountable for trying to cram this Obamacare bill down America’s throats. We won’t forget. [November 2010]

I’d like to thank The Huffington Post for having the courage, [ balls, ovaries, hutzpa, spunk] to cover today’s Code RED 3.16.10 Washington D.C. Tea Party Protest. I can at least say there is one news outlet in America that seems to care enough to make an effort to track the maneuvering and posturing, and to follow the MSM’s ineptitude in covering anything about what is actually happening at this stage of the process, as opposed to what the presume is happening. The Huff Post coverage seems bent toward favoring the bill, but at least it is coverage.

See http://huffingtonpost.com’s front page for 3.16.2010

Just locating ANY news coverage about today’s DC Tea party protest  has been an exercise in REALITY checking how “state controlled” our mass media outlets have now become.

It’s frightening. Once again, it seemed that a prior directive had been “issued” to ignore the DC tea party march. But thanks to the good folks who run patriot related and alternative news blogs, and the other sharp citizen journalists who attended and were quick to post their videos, I have some info to share about today’s events in DC. I regret that for health reasons I could not attend.

So here are some of the latest videos, and some noteworthy re-posts from the few mainstream news sources which apparently still give a damn whether or not we are subject to socialized medicine in the USA against our wills. I’m worried, very worried about my country.

– Chase

Noteworthy coverage from the Huff Post:

Another day in the health care reform debate brings with it another battle over parliamentary procedure, and another example of the media struggling to get some basic facts right. Today, the battle is joined over deeming resolutions, the process by which House Democrats may finally overcome hurdles and worries to get the process of passing reform moving forward.

The GOP has advanced the idea that the “deem and pass” process — also known as “The Slaughter Rule” because the idea was suggested by Representative Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) — is tantamount to passing health care reform without voting on it. The media has largely accepted, or at least lent credence to this premise. But does that sound right to you, Marc Ambinder?

..that’s wrong. House Democrats aren’t doing that.
In fact, they ARE taking an up or down vote on the Senate health care bill. They’re just doing it AT THE SAME TIME as they’re passing the reconciliation language, which countermands several controversial provisions.

Here’s what’s going on. The House is stuck having to basically pass the Senate health care bill, because the bill cannot be reconciled in conference committee. Why? Because it will be filibustered. However, House members are averse to doing anything that looks like they approve of the various side-deals that were made in the Senate — like the so-called “Cornhusker Kickback.” The House intends to remove those unpopular features in budget reconciliation, but if they pursue budget reconciliation on a standard legislative timeline — where they pass the Senate bill outright first and then go back to pass a reconciliation package of fixes — they’d still appear to be endorsing the sketchy side deals, and then the GOP would jump up and down on their heads.

Enter “deem and pass.” Under this process, the House will simply skip to approving the reconciliation fixes, and “deem” the Senate bill to be passed. By doing it this way, the Democrats get the Senate bill passed while simultaneously coming out against the unpopular features of the same.

YES. All of this is basically motivated by concerns over perceptions and other such cosmetic bullshit. This is all about the House Democrats being scared out of their minds that they’ll have to spend even an hour explaining, “No, we do not approve of the Cornhusker Kickback.” But that’s America, circa 2010. It makes the Democrats look timid, but it doesn’t make them wrong.

This is now the third round of opposition that’s been put before the media ever since the “Slaughter Rule” was first proposed. The first round featured Republicans going nuts about it, on the grounds that it was some sort of unprecedented legislative maneuver. Just like they said about budget reconciliation! Sadly, that doesn’t bear up under scrutiny. As Ryan Grim reports, however, deeming resolutions are pretty darned precedented:

The first time that the chamber used what’s known as a “deeming resolution” — the mechanism Democrats are leaning toward using to pass the Senate health care bill through the House — was March 16, 1933. Then, as now, it involved a bill that had little support in the chamber among individual Democrats, but all of them knew they had to pass it. Very few Democrats want to vote for the Senate version of health care reform, but most are okay with it as long as it’s amended through reconciliation.

Less than two weeks into FDR’s first 100 days, Congress needed to raise its debt ceiling, a ritual vote that hasn’t gotten any easier for the majority party in the intervening 77 years — and is still political fodder for partisan opponents.

Instead of voting on the underlying Senate bill to raise the debt ceiling in 1933, the House voted on Resolution 63, which stated that “immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the bill H.R. 2820, with Senate amendments thereto, be, and the same hereby is, taken from the Speaker’s table to the end that all Senate amendments be, and the same are hereby, agreed to.”

More recently, Grim notes that deeming resolutions were used by Republicans “36 times in 2005 and 2006,” and by Democrats “49 times in 2007 and 2008.”

The second salvo from health care opponents arrived in the form of complaints that Louise Slaughter once opposed the use of her own “Slaughter Rule” on the grounds that it was unconstitutional. As Ezra Klein explains, that’s true:

So today’s furor is that Nancy Pelosi and Louise Slaughter joined Public Citizen in a lawsuit arguing that a bill that George W. Bush signed was invalid because Deem and Pass is unconstitutional. But the court ruled against Public Citizen, Pelosi and Slaughter. Deem and Pass, well, passed. And now Democrats are using it, too.

Of course, the fact that Slaughter learned that deeming resolutions were entirely above board is probably what informed her decision to employ a deeming resolution!

I don’t think anyone captured the baseline of this ongoing back-and-forth raging over parliamentary procedures better than Matt Yglesias, who writes, “Everyone knows that 100 percent of the people who like the underlying health care bill will approve of the use of the procedural mechanisms necessary to enact it, whereas 100 percent of the process-objectors will also be people who don’t like the bill.” It stands to reason that if all the majorities were flipped and the GOP was about to use “Deem And Pass” to get something passed, they’d pull the trigger on it and never look back.

There’s no doubt at all that this legislative obscuranta is confusing. But it’s not impossible to explain, you just have to want to explain it. Unfortunately, the media is doing a terrible job at this task. Per Byron Tau, over at The New Republic:

But the way that some journalists are describing it, you’d think the House Democrats were willing a bill into law by magic. “House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it,” blared a Washington Post headline. The Post’s only explanation of the tactic came from Nancy Pelosi, who said, “It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know.”
The Wall Street Journal editorial board went even further, beginning their editorial with a cutesy fairy tale setup:

We’re not sure American schools teach civics any more, but once upon a time they taught that under the U.S. Constitution a bill had to pass both the House and Senate to become law. Until this week, that is, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi is moving to merely “deem” that the House has passed the Senate health-care bill and then send it to President Obama to sign anyway.

None of this is new! Does one side want health care and the other side not want health care and nobody wants to compromise? Yay! SHINY HORSE RACE FOR THE MEDIA TO COVER. Who cares if the contention that Nancy Pelosi wants to pass health care reform without a vote is a lie? To the political press, a lie is just an “interesting point of view.”

Please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com — learn more about our media monitoring project here.

Know something we don’t? E-mail us at huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com

==============


=================

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

AMERICAN SOCIALISM RED ALERT: National Health ID Cards Are A Recipe for RFID Disaster

Aaron Russo, 2006 at Cannes Film Festival.
Image via Wikipedia

3.10.2010 By Chase K. Hunter

Supporting Article Re-post Courtesy of Sorcha Faal

I’ve been writing and warning readers and American citizens and my neighbors everywhere about the heinous nature of RFID microchipping plans for at least 3 years. Last summer I identified elements hidden in the first Obamacare Plan that called for a national healthcare identification number for every US citizen, a piece of legislation that has been intentionally crafted to lead, once again through the well known NWO tactic that I call “insidious gradualism” to mandatory RFID chipping of all Americans.

I have suspected from the very beginning of Obama’s presidency that he was working under a CFR mandate to put the legislative elements in place that would attempt to “normalize” the idea of RFID chipping for American citizens, in an eventual conclusion that would commence with issuing a National Healthcare ID Card for all Americans under his health care overhaul.

People might argue, as I am quite sure that the pro-Obama left will, that any connection made between a national healthcare ID card under obamacare and mandatory human RFID chipping is pure here say.

They are dead wrong. The process of gradually acclimatizing Americans to a national identification system [for nefarious purposes which would appear “benign” initially] was tried years ago under Bill Clinton’s administration, and it was mentioned repeatedly under Bush W. regime, even as a nationa driver’s license. How quickly foolish and distracted Americans forget about these things. These events I mention from the past are not unrelated.

The NWO behind the scenes “puppet master crowd” has been trying to get Americans to accept the idea and actuality of a national identification system of some sort for at least 16 years, that I can recall. I started doing research and writing about the New World Order in 1991.

So none of this is new to me, except that the tone of the dialogue has now become quite urgent, as Americans struggle to understand why accepting a national healthcare overhaul must include also accepting an RFID embedded  national healthcare ID card. The national healthcare card will lead to mandatory human RFID chipping.

I have a dire warning to make, and I must issue that warning now, while the dialogue is still open: if legislation is passed which includes any sort of mandatory national healthcare ID card in it, then we will have marched one more 100 mile leap, in one step, toward eventual human RFID chipping which will become mandatory.

Please America, I am pleading with you, do not allow this to happen. I know our healthcare system needs overhauling. But that need cannot be used as  tacit justification to cram a nationa healthcare Identification system down our throats that steps us closer to mandatory human RFID chipping.

I MUST reiterate something here. HEAR THIS: I don’t care what I am called, who calls me out, who does the name calling, who ridicules me, or what they say: my soul HAS SEEN the future of what they intend to do to human populations under mandatory human RFID chipping, and others like Aaron Russo have seen it too. He was close friends with Nick Rockefeller for years and was told POINT BLANK by Rockefeller what the world government plan is, and that mandatory human RFID chipping is integral to that plan and it’s implementation.

We cannot allow this to happen. Speak out, call your local conservative talk radio show, make your voice heard, email and write, call your senator and congressman and let them know how vehemently you OPPOSE any legislation which will lead to mandatory human RFID chips in this country.

Bringing a national healthcare ID card bill up at this particular moment in the debate is a RED FLAG for this nation about what is hidden in the Obamacare health care bill.

We literally have days left to speak out and say NO. This is where it stops.

I cannot implore my readers and guests enough about how important this is. Make your voices HEARD NOW if you do not want to wake up into a reality just a few years from now, where you are asked to bring in your health ID card, turn it in, and accept the imbedded chip instead in order to keep working, keep your healthcare coverage and not be jailed.

Chase Kyla Hunter

WATCH:

Historic Aaron Russo Alex Jones Interview: One World Government, RFID Chipped Population, “From Freedom to Fascism”

=========

See also:

RFID Chip Battle: The Front Lines

HAARP Project Blue Beam Fake Holographic Second Coming, Maitreya World Apostasy, RFID Technology

RFID Microchips Everywhere Means Total Loss of Privacy

Katie Couric’s Epic Fail: Promoting Human RFID Chipping to America On Live TV

Human RFID Lab Rats Unaware Chips Cause Maligant Tumors, Cancer

How to Kill Your RFID Chip

Facebook, I-Phone & the Future of RFID

David Rockefeller’s Evil RFID Plans for World Domination By International Bankers

Human RFID Chipping: Youtube Videos

Human Lab Rats Unaware of the Dire Consequences of Being Voluntarily RFID Chipped

Protect your privacy and your identity: Suggested popular

RFID Blocking Products, Books, RFID Access Override Products:

Wine Red Leather RFID Blocking Passport Case

Travelon RFID Blocking ID and Boarding Pass Holder

Travelon RFID Blocking Tri-Fold Wallet

DIFRwear RFID Blocking Wallet – Black

Travelon RFID Blocking Passport Case

Travelon RFID Blocking Billfold

MUST READ BOOK: Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID

Bypass Essentials 1101T Universal Bypass Allows remote start in vehicles equipped with Proximity RFID “Push-to-Start” or “Smart Key” systems

RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy

Socket Communications CompactFlash RFID Reader Card 6E ( RF5400-542 )

[ RFID Technology] Skin Deep: Man’s Appointment With Destiny

========

Obama Moves For National ID Card, Military Prison For All Dissenters

Contributed by Sorcha Faal

Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:51
More stories from this contributor

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Important to note about these new laws Obama is preparing his Nation for is that they are all being quietly put into place while the people in America are being distracted by their propaganda media organs to focus their attention on the so called health care debate and have been deliberately hidden in bills without their knowing.New reports coming from America today are warning that as that troubled Nation edges ever closer to what economists are calling the“unstoppable second crash”, and as their descent into outright socialist rule continues unabated, President Obama is preparing to unleash upon his citizens the most draconian and tyrannical laws ever enacted in their entire history.

One of these new “hidden” laws is being put forward as an immigration measure supposedly to deal with their growing numbers of illegal immigrants, but as we can read as reported by the Wall Street Journal News Service has much more ominous implications for all Americans:

“Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card all American workers would eventually be required to obtain.

Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.”

To those Americans prepared to oppose Obama’s plan to remake the United States into a Communist Nation another new law will enable the US Military to arrest and hold them without trial forever, and as we can read as reported by the Atlantic Magazine News Service:

“Why is the national security community treating the “Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010,” introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration’s choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activityRead the bill here, and then read the summarized points after the jump.

According to the summary, the bill sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning.

(There is no distinction between U.S. persons–visa holders or citizens–and non-U.S. persons.)”

In order for Obama’s “grand plan” of communizing the American people to succeed he has deliberately targeted their middle classes for destruction, and no where is this more evident than in millions of them being thrown from their homes, and as we had previously reported on in our February 16th report “Obama Plot To Throw Millions Of Americans From Homes Uncovered”.

Not satisfied with the pace of this destruction of his middle classes, however, Obama is preparing new laws to force a further 5 million of his citizens from their homes and into the streets, and as we can read as reported by the New York Times News Service:

“In an effort to end the foreclosure crisis, the Obama administration has been trying to keep defaulting owners in their homes. Now it will take a new approach: paying some of them to leave.

This latest program, which will allow owners to sell for less than they owe and will give them a little cash to speed them on their way, is one of the administration’s most aggressive attempts to grapple with a problem that has defied solutions.

More than five million households are behind on their mortgages and risk foreclosure. The government’s $75 billion mortgage modification plan has helped only a small slice of them. Consumer advocates, economists and even some banking industry representatives say much more needs to be done.”

In our March 2nd report “Russia Warns US Communist Threat Endangering Entire World” we had detailed the plans of Obama’s Communist forces to destroy the United States and further warned these Americans of Congressman Ron Paul’s warning to them that their own government was preparing to openly assassinate all who oppose them, but to no avail as the masses of these people continue to deny the overwhelming evidence showing their destruction is near at hand.

And to the “new world” these unsuspecting Americans are entering into we can glimpse from the Kitco New Service article titled “America’s Impending Master Class Dictatorship” and which warns:

“According to the Federal Reserve’s most recent report on wealth, America’s private net worth was $53.4 trillion as of September, 2009. But at the same time, America’s debt and unfunded liabilities totaled at least $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion), or 225% of the citizens’ net worth.

Even if the government expropriated every dollar of private wealth in the nation, it would still have a deficit of $66,600,000,000,000.00 ($66.6 trillion), equal to $214,286.00 for every man, woman and child in America and roughly 500% of GDP. If the government does not directly seize the nation’s private wealth, then it will require $389,610 from each and every citizen to balance the country’s books.

State, county and municipal debts and deficits are additional, already elephantine in many states (e.g., California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York) and growing at an alarming rate nationwide. In addition to the federal government, dozens of states are already bankrupt and sinking deeper into the morass every day.

The government continues to dig a deeper and deeper fiscal grave in which to bury its citizens. This year, the federal deficit will total at least $1,600,000,000,000.00 ($1.6 trillion), which represents overspending of $4,383,561,600.00 ($4.38 billion) per day. (The deficit during October and November, 2009, the first two months of Fiscal Year 2010, totaled $296,700,000,000.00 ($297 billion), or $4,863,934,000.00 ($4.9 billion) per day, a record.)

Using the GAAP accounting method (which is what corporations are required to use because it presents a far more accurate and honest picture of a company’s finances than the cash accounting method primarily and misleadingly used by the U.S. government), the nation’s fiscal year 2009 deficit was roughly $9,000,000,000,000.00 ($9 trillion), or $24,700,000,000.00 ($24.7 billion) per day, as calculated by brilliant and well-respected economist John Williams. (www.shadowstats.com) Fiscal Year 2010’s cash- and GAAP-accounting deficits will likely be worse than 2009’s, given government bailout and new program spending that is on steroids and psychotic.

Putting Fiscal Year 2009’s $9,000,000,000,000.00 ($9 trillion) deficit another way, 17% of America’s private wealth, accumulated over a period of 235 years, was wiped out by just one year’s worth of government deficit spending insanity.”

To if the American people will arise in their righteous wrath to confront the destruction of their Nation it is not in our knowing, other than to note, that in all of history, those who have given up their freedom to despotic rulers have, without exception, condemned themselves, their children, and their grandchildren, to lives of servitude and degradation towards the cruelest of masters who only see them as useless eaters fit for nothing but death.

And do not think for one second that these words are written lightly either, and by clicking on this link you can hear for yourself one of these elites, Bill “Microsoft” Gates, the World’s richest man, calling for the outright destruction of over 1 billion human beings to de-populate our Earth…of which you, undoubtedly, are a part of.

© March 9, 2010 EU and US all rights reserved

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

For more visit What Does It Mean?


Want to share YOUR story with our dynamic and rapidly growing audience? Click Here to join for free.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]